VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M.S.Aruchamy @ Arumugam v. The State Rep By, the Inspector of Police,

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 February 2026
Bench
A.D.Jagadish Chandiraauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 4750/2026

Judgment

ORDER The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.171 of 2022, pending against the Page2 of 6 petitioner on the file of the first respondent police.

¶2Based on the complaint lodged by the second respondent, alleging that the petitioner trespassed into the Suleeswaranpatti Panchayat Office, where the election to the post of Chairman of the Panchayat was conducted, grabbed the ballot papers, torn them into pieces and took away with him, the aforesaid case in Crime No.171 of 2022 was registered on 17.03.2022 for the offences under Sections 447 and 171-F of IPC, which is now sought to be quashed.

¶3The submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner are as follows:-

3.1. The alleged incident is said to have taken place on

04.03.2022 and the case was registered on 17.03.2022. The maximum punishment prescribed for the aforesaid offences is tabulated hereunder: Sections Punishment 447 IPC Imprisonment may extend to three months or with fine or with both 171-F IPC Imprisonment may extend to 1 year or with fine or with both or if treating only, fine only

3.2. In respect of the aforesaid offences, the investigation ought Page3 of 6 to have been completed and the final report filed within one year from the date of registration of the FIR, as mandated under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Therefore, there is a clear bar for taking cognizance if it is filed beyond one year from the date of registration of FIR.

3.3. Since the final report has not been filed within one year, the learned Magistrate is barred from taking cognizance. Hence, the continuation of the criminal proceedings against the petitioner is an abuse of process of law and the same is liable to be quashed. Therefore, he prayed to quash the FIR pending against the petitioner.

¶4Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the first respondent Police, on instructions, submitted that the investigation in this case has been completed; the charge sheet has been filed on 24.10.2025 and the same has been taken cognizance of on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Pollachi, in C.C.No.1037 of 2025. However, he fairly admitted that there is a delay.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶6For the punishment set out in paragraph 3.1, supra, the final report ought to have been filed within one year from the date of registration of Page4 of 6 the FIR, as per Section 468(2)(b) of Cr.P.C. However, in the instant case, the final report has been filed on 24.10.2025, which is beyond the period of one year since the registration of the FIR and therefore, cognizance should not have been taken.

¶7In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending against the petitioner in connection with Crime No.171 of 2022 and the same is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and all further proceedings pending against the petitioner pursuant to the FIR in Crime No.171 of 2022 which has now culminated into C.C.No.1037 of 2025 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Pollachi, are hereby quashed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 26-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SRM Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Pollachi, Coimbatore District.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Pollachi East Police Station, Pollachi, Coimbatore District.

¶3The Election Officer/Executive Officer Suleeswaranpatti Town Panchayat, Suleeswaranpatti, Pollachi, Coimbatore District.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o4750oofo2026 A.D.JAGADISHoCHANDIRA,oJ. SRM CRLoOPoNo.o4750oofo2026 26-02-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Crl.M.P.No.3387 of 2026 M.S.Aruchamy @ Arumugam ..Petitioner Vs 1. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Pollachi East Police Station, Pollachi, Coimbatore District. 2. The Election Officer/Executive Officer Suleeswaranpatti Town Panchayat, Suleeswaranpatti, Pollachi, Coimbatore District. ..Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to call for records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.171 of 2022 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Jahan For Respondents : Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.