- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 21 April 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 14437/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose
Judgment
Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to issue computerised patta in favour of the petitioner and his sisters for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner's representation dated 05.01.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
2.According to the petitioner, a manual patta was issued for the property, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition in favour of the petitioner and his sisters a)Devi and b)Gomathy through patta No.1013. The petitioner now seeks for issuance of the computerised patta in his name and his sisters' name, namely, a)Devi and b)Gomathy. The petitioner had given a representation on 05.01.2026 to the first respondent for the aforesaid purpose. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
3.Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Page3 of 4
5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation seeking for issuance of patta.
6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 05.01.2026 seeking for issuance of computerised patta in favour of the petitioner and his sisters a)Devi and b)Gomathy through patta No.1013 for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the neighbouring land owners or any other third party whom the second respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 21-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order VGA Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA To
¶1The Sub Collector Office of the Sub Collector, Jaggampet, Tindivanam Town and Taluk, Villupuram District.
¶2The Tahsildar, Office of the Gingee Taluk, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District.
¶3The Village Administrative Officer, Office of the V.A.O, Nallan Pillai Pettral Village and Post, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District. 21-04-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE MR.G.Thirumavalavan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Sub Collector Office of the Sub Collector, Jaggampet, Tindivanam Town and Taluk, Villupuram District. 2. The Tahsildar, Office of the Gingee Taluk, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District. 3. The Village Administrative Officer, Office of the V.A.O, Nallan Pillai Pettral Village and Post, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District. ..Respondent(s) Directing to the first respondent to consider the petitioner representation dated 05.01.2026 and download in online patta to the name of petitioner and his sisters 1.Devi, 2.Gomathy in patta number 1013. Survey number 426/9-0.38.0 square meter in Nallan Pillai Petral Village, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District. First respondent in file No.PA/AA1/1438/2023 dated 22.06.2023 on the file of the Tahsildar, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Thirumalai For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt.Advocate Page2 of 4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.