VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

K.Samraj v. District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 March 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 7191/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to restore the land and cancel the patta for the property more fully described in the prayer to this writ petition based on the petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2026.

¶2At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is confining his relief only with regard to the cancellation of patta and is not pressing for restoration of the land. The said statement is recorded by this Court.

¶3Since the petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2026 has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.

¶4Mr. C. Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of Respondents 1 to 4.

¶5The competent authority to consider the petitioner's representation, seeking for cancellation of patta, is the third respondent. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation seeking for cancellation of patta for the property morefully described in the writ petition, which is presently standing in the name of the 5th respondent, is considered on merits and in accordance with law after hearing the objections of the 5th respondent and any other third party, whom the third respondent deems fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶6This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

¶7Since no adverse orders are passed against the 5th respondent, notice to the 5th respondent is dispensed with.

¶8For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 06.01.2026, insofar as the cancellation of patta standing in the name of the 5th respondent alone, after hearing the objections of the 5th respondent and any other third party whom the third respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 03-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To

1.District Collector Ranipet District Collectorate, Ranipet - 632 401.

2.District Revenue Officer Ranipet District Revenue Office, Ranipet - 632 401.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Ranipet Revenue Divisional Office, Ranipet, Ranipet District - 632 401.

4.Tahsildar Arcot Taluk Officer, Arcot, Ranipet District - 632 503. ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

03-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. K.Samraj Petitioner(s) Vs 1. District Collector Ranipet District Collectorate, Ranipet - 632 401. 2.District Revenue Officer Ranipet District Revenue Office, Ranipet - 632 401. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Ranipet Revenue Divisional Office, Ranipet, Ranipet District - 632 401. 4.Tahsildar Arcot Taluk Officer, Arcot, Ranipet District - 632 503. 5.D.Sundaram Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondents to restore the land and cancel the Patta obtained out of forged will and issue Patta in the name of legal heirs of Varadarajulu chettiar based on the representation sent by the petitioner dated 06.01.2026. For Petitioner(s): M/s.M.Gangatharan For Respondent: Mr. C. Jayaprakash, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.