VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Senthil Kumar Gopinath v. The Deputy State Tax Officer-2

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 February 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 6840/2026

Judgment

ORDER Mr.C.Harsharaj, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader for the Respondent.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 03.12.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 18.08.2025 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 03.12.2025.

¶4The Petitioner was also issued with three Reminders which called upon the Petitioner to file a reply and to appear for a personal hearing. However, the Petitioner neither filed any reply nor appeared for the personal hearing despite multiple opportunities. Thus, the impugned Order has been passed.

¶5It is noticed that the present Writ Petition has been filed on 18.02.2026 i.e., within the period of limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order. Page3 of 6

¶6At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 10% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication.

¶7The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which is extracted hereunder:- "The petitioner oblige to pay 10% of the amount as pre-deposit to remand back the matter to the Respondent."

¶8Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 10% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.

¶9Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page4 of 6

¶10Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 18.08.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

03.12.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 18.08.2025.

¶11In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶12It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶13In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today. Page5 of 6

¶14Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶15This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 27-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order av To The DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER-2 Ayanavaram Assessment Circle Commercial Tax Building No.1, Papjm Annex Building 3rd Floor, Greams Road Chennai-600 006 WPoNo.o6840oofo2026 C.SARAVANAN,oJ. av WPoNo.o6840oofo2026o ando WMP.Nos.o7425oo&o7427oofo2026 27-02-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP.Nos. 7425 & 7427 of 2026 Senthil Kumar Gopinath Proprietor Of Akshiya Veg Restarunt, 192, Purasaiwakkam High Roadkilpauk, Chennai 600 010 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER-2 Ayanavaram Assessment Circle Commercial Tax Building No.1, Papjm Annex Building 3rd Floor, Greams Road Chennai-600 006 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari call for the records culminating Order No. ZD331225044477G dated 03.12.2025 passed by the respondent and quash the same as per se illegal and pass such further or other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Rakesh P For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Harsharaj Special Government Pleader Page2 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.