Ms Subha Anandham Surgicals v. The State Tax Officer

ORDER Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 17.11.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 10.07.2025 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 17.11.2025.

¶4The limitation for filing an appeal is provided under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017. The present Writ Petition has been filed on

10.02.2026, i.e. within the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017.

¶5At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 10% of the disputed tax as a condition for Page3 of 6 denovo adjudication.

¶6The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made the following endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:- "We accept to pay 10% of the disputed tax and remand back the matter to the proper officer."

¶7In view of the above, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 10% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 10.07.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

17.11.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 10.07.2025.

¶10In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall Page4 of 6 also stand automatically vacated.

¶11In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶12Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶13This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 26-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order BKN Page5 of 6 To: The State Tax Officer Office of the Commercial Tax officer, Cuddalore Town Assessment Circle, Cuddalore. Page6 of 6

C.SARAVANAN, J. BKN 26-02-2026

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.7098 & 7101 of 2026 Ms Subha Anandham Surgicals Represented by its Partner K.Kavitha 11A-3, Hospital Road, Cuddalore 607 001 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Tax Officer Office of the Commercial Tax officer, Cuddalore Town Assessment Circle, Cuddalore. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the records on the files of Respondent in Impugned Order in proceedings vide GSTIN 33ADIFS5876K1ZG /2021-2022 dated 17.11.2025 along with consequential order in form GST DRC-07 bearing a Ref No ZD331125299929S dated 17.11.2025 for the tax Period April 2021 to March 2022 to quash the same and pass For Petitioner(s): Mr.Vignesh Kumar .K For Respondent(s): Ms.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Advocate Page2 of 6