VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Aadarsh Surana v. Deputy Commission (St)

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 February 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 7786/2026

Judgment

ORDER Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the 1st Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

¶3The petitioner who was a formal Director of a Company by name M/s.Amarprakash Property Management Services Private Limited, is before this Court against the impugned recovery notice dated 24.11.2025, seeking to attach the petitioner's bank account.

¶4The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner seized to be the Director of the aforesaid company with effect from 18.06.2019. The pe titioner has also Page3 of 6 filed a copy of Form DIR -12 to substantiate the same which indicates that the petitioner seized to be the Director of the said company with effect from

18.06.2019.

¶5The petitioner appears to have made out a prima facie case on merits. Under similar circumstances, cases have been remitted back to the respondent to pass fresh order by treating the impugned order as a notice under Section 89 of the respective GST Enactments.

¶6Reference was made to the order of this Court in Subir ghosh Vs. Deputy Commissioner (ST) (FAC) reported in (2025) 180 taxmann.com 149 (Madras).

¶7Considering the same, the case is remitted back to the 1st Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Pending such exercise, the recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance and the attachment of petitioner's bank account shall stands lifted.

¶8Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner. Page4 of 6

¶9This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 25-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order BKN Page5 of 6 To:

¶1Deputy Commission (ST) Tambaram Zone 4th floor, PAPJM Building Greams Road Chennai-600 006 Page6 of 6

C.SARAVANAN, J. BKN 25-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.8386 & 8388 of 2026 Aadarsh Surana S/o.Sudhir Kumar surana.A, F 201 Taisha Housing SocietyNatesan Nagar 2 Main RoadKaliamman Koil Street, Virugambakkam Chennai - 600092. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Deputy Commission (ST) Tambaram Zone 4th floor, PAPJM Building Greams Road Chennai-600 006 2. Karur Vysya Bank Plot No 21, Door No,85, Kaliamman Kovil Street,Chinmaya Nagar, Chennai,Chennai - 600 092. 3. The Branch Manager, City Union Bank No. 42, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road,Nehru Nagar, Chrompet,Chennai - 600 044. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order bearing reference Number GSTIN: 33AAALCA0402C1ZK/Apr-2019 to March-2020 dated 24.11.2025 passed by the 1st respondent, quash the same Page2 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr.Pawan Jhabakh For Respondent(s): Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, Government Advocate for R1

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.