VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Imtiaz Ali v. The State Tax Officer

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 February 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 6331/2026

Judgment

ORDER Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate, takes notice for the respondent.

¶2With the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the time of admission.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned Assessment Order along with the Summary Order, both dated 05.08.2024, pertaining to the tax period 2019-2020.

¶4By the impugned order, the petitioner was imposed with late fees under Section 47(2) and a general penalty under Section 125 of the respective GST enactments.

¶5The impugned order itself records that the due date for filing the Form GSTR-9 return for the year 2019-2020 was 31.03.2021, however, the petitioner filed the return on 17.11.2022. This filing date is before the cut-off date prescribed under Notification No.7/2023-Central Tax dated 31.03.2023 as amended by Notification No.25/2023-Central Tax dated 17.07.2023.

¶6Under similar circumstances, proceedings have been dropped where returns were filed belatedly upon payment of Rs.10,000/- each, in accordance with Notification No.7/2023-Central Tax dated 31.03.2023.

¶7Since the issue is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Ms. Kandan Hardware Mart vs. Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) [W.P. Nos. 27029 of 2023 batch, dated 02.01.2026], the case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order on merits in light of the above decision, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

17.02.2026 raja To The State Tax Officer, (also known as Commercial Tax Officer), Kondalampatty Circle, Salem, Tamil Nadu.

C.SARAVANAN, J. raja

17.02.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.6825 & 6827 of 2026 Mr. Imtiaz Ali, Proprietor, Tvl. Indo Chem Co., No.58-B/1, Kalar kadu, Ammani Kondalampatty, P.Nattamangalam, Salem, Tamil Nadu – 636010. ... Petitioner Vs. The State Tax Officer, (also known as Commercial Tax Officer), Kondalampatty Circle, Salem, Tamil Nadu. ... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the impugned order passed by the respondent in GSTIN: 33ADDPA0753C1ZH / 2019-20 dated 05.08.2024, Order under section 73 and the summary of the order in FORM GST DRC-07 both dated 05.08.2024 issued in Reference No: ZD330824030387E and quash the same as passed in violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to law and further direct the respondent to rework the late fee in light of the Notification No.07/2023-Central Tax dated 31.03.2023 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), Government of India. For Petitioner : Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap For Respondent : Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.