VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S. Shanthi, v. The Managing Director,

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 February 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 6907/2026

Judgment

ORDER The present writ petition is filed for a direction to the respondents to sanction the family pension of petitioners deceased husband Mr. K. Shanmugam and to pay the family pension to the petitioner along with arrears from the date of death of her husband by considering the petitioner's representation dated 07-11-2025 on merits and in accordance with the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 within the time frame fixed by this Court.

¶2The case of the petitioner is that the marriage between the petitioner and one K.Shanmugam was solemnized in front of the elders and the villagers. The petitioner's husband retired from service as Checking Inspector. The petitioner's husband died leaving behind the petitioner and four other children. The petitioner requested the second respondent to sanction family pension to her but the respondents have denied to sanction the same and orally stated that there is delay in approaching the office and further stated that being the second wife of her husband they are not in a position to sanction family pension to her. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 07.11.2025 to the respondents requesting them to sanction the family pension. However, the Page3 of 5 respondents are not taking steps to sanction the family pension to the petitioner. Hence the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.

¶3Though very many grounds have been raised in this Writ Petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, it would suffice, if this Court issues a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.11.2025 and pass appropriate orders on merits, within a particular time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶4The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that they have no objection for the said order being passed by this Court.

¶5Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶6Taking into consideration the factual aspects of the matter, this court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the respondents, to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 07.11.2025, and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page4 of 5

¶7The writ petition stands disposed of with the above directions. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected WMP No.44630 of 2025 is closed. 20-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order MRN To

¶1The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Ltd., 37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore - 641 043.

¶2The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Ltd., Chennimalai Road, Erode - 1.

¶3The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation EPF Trust, Pallavan House, Thiruvalluvar Salai, Chennai - 600 002 Page5 of 5

M.DHANDAPANI, J. MRN 20-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 6907 of 2026 S. Shanthi, ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Ltd., 37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore - 641 043. 2. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Coimbatore) Ltd., Chennimalai Road, Erode - 1. 3. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation EPF Trust, Pallavan House, Thiruvalluvar Salai, Chennai - 600 002 ..Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, directing the respondents to sanction the family pension of petitioners deceased husband Mr. K. Shanmugam and to pay the family pension to the petitioner along with arrears from the date of death of her husband by considering the petitioner's representation dated 07-11-2025 on merits and in accordance with the Tamil Page2 of 5 Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.N.K.Ponraj For Respondents : Mr.M.Murali Vinoth

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.