VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

A.Sriram v. Indian Overseas Bank

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 October 2025
Bench
T. Vinod Kumarauthor
Case no.
WP 6427/2019

Follow Madras High CourtFollow T. Vinod Kumar

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WP Nos. 6427 & 6434 of 2019 & WMP.No.7241 of 2019 A.Sriram Clerk/shroff/Godown Keeper (Under Suspension) No 12/9, Srinivasa Naidu Street, Radhanangar Chrompet, Chennai-44 Petitioner in both WPs Vs

¶1Indian Overseas Bank Rep by its chief Manager Ekkattuthangal Branch, Chennai-32

2.The Deputy General Manger/ Disciplinary Authority, Central Office, 763, Anna Salai, Chennai-2 Respondent(s) in both WPs PRAYER in W.P.No.6427 of 2019 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the 1st Respondent dated 2-2-2019 in DO EO(MN) VIG-F-9390 5951-2018-19, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to provide legal assistance to the petitioner in the departmental enquiry held against the petitioner pursuant to the charge sheet dated 12-07-2016. PRAYER in W.P.No.6434 of 2019: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order passed by the 2 nd respondent in proceedings No.DO;DGM

(PVV):DA:VIG:93905953:2018-2019 dated 01.02.2019, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to engage a lawyer in the departmental enquiry held against the petitioner pursuant to charge sheet dated 12.07.2016. For Petitioner in both WPs: Niranjan Rajagopalan For M/s. G.R.Associates For Respondents in both WPs: Mr. K. Srinivasamurthy, Senior Counsel COMMON ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to the petitioner approaching this Court by filing the writ petitions, the respondent authorities have passed an order in disciplinary proceedings initiated as against him and the petitioner also availed further remedy of appeal and as such, the present writ petitions have become infructuous.

¶2Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that pending the present writ petitions, the respondent authorities have passed an order in disciplinary proceedings initiated against the petitioner vide order dated

19.12.2019 removing the petitioner from service and against the said order, the petitioner has also availed the remedy of appeal and the same was also disposed of by the Appellate Authority, vide order dated 12.08.2021, confirming the order of the Disciplinary Authority.

¶3Having regard to the aforesaid submission, since the petitioner subsequent to filing of the present writ petitions, having taken part in the disciplinary proceedings and also having assailed the orders in the appeal, this Court is of the view that the relief sought for in the present writ petitions has become infructuous and as such, no further orders are required to be passed. Accordingly, these writ petitions are closed. No Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. msr 06-10-2025 Index:Yes/No Internet: Yes/No To

1.Indian Overseas Bank Rep by its chief Manager Ekkattuthangal Branch chennai-32

2.The Deputy General Manger/ Disciplinary Authority Central Office 763, Anna Salai chennai-2 WPeNo.e6427eofe2019 T.VINODoKUMARoJ. msr WPoNos.o6427o&o6434oofo 2019oo& WMP.No.7241oofo2019 o 06-10-2025

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.