VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Focus View v. The Deputy State Tax Officer 1

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 February 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 8076/2026

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.02.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.8076, 8082, 8107 and 8111 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.8739, 8740, 8743, 8744, 8767, 8768, 8968, 8776 and 8777 of 2026 W.P.No.8076 of 2026:- Focus View, Represented by its Partner R.S.Neeraj

... Petitioner

Vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer – 1, Alagapuram Assessment Circle, Salem, Tamil Nadu. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in GSTIN No.33AACFF3472B1Z0/2021-22 on the files of the Respondent, quash the impugned order dated 19.07.2024 with the reference No.ZD330724236680G for the FY 2021-22, and direct the Respondent to pass orders afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner firm. W.P.No.8082 of 2026:- Focus View, Represented by its Partner R.S.Neeraj

... Petitioner

Vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer – 1, Alagapuram Assessment Circle, Salem, Tamil Nadu. ... Respondent

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in GSTIN No.33AACFF3472B1Z0/2020-21 on the files of the Respondent, quash the impugned order dated 19.07.2024 with the reference No.ZD330724234178D for the FY 2020-21, and direct the Respondent to pass orders afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner firm. W.P.No.8107 of 2026:- Focus View, Represented by its Partner R.S.Neeraj

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Deputy State Tax Officer – 1, Alagapuram Assessment Circle, Salem, Tamil Nadu.

2.The Branch Manager, DBS Bank, Swarnapuri Branch 49 A, Advaitha Ashram Rd, Opp.New Bus Stand Road, Swarnapuri, Salem, Tamil Nadu – 636 004. ... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in the impugned order dated 18.04.2024 with the reference No.ZD3304241412030 for the FY 2018-19 in the files of the First Respondent, quash the same and direct the First Respondent to pass orders afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner firm. W.P.No.8111 of 2026:- Focus View, Represented by its Partner R.S.Neeraj

... Petitioner

Vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer – 1, Alagapuram Assessment Circle, Salem, Tamil Nadu. ... Respondent

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in GSTIN No:33AACFF3472B1Z0/2019-20 on the files of the Respondent, quash the impugned order dated 19.07.2024 with the reference No.ZD330724233467B for the FY 2019-20, and direct the Respondent to pass orders afresh after giving an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner firm. For Petitioner : M/s.Z.Shabeer (in all W.Ps) For Respondent : Mrs.P.Selvi (in all W.Ps) Government Advocate COMMON ORDER Mrs.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondents.

¶2These Writ Petitions are being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondents.

¶3The Petitioner has challenged the following orders as detailed below:- Sl.Nos. W.P.Nos. Tax Period Date

of Impugned order Date of Show Cause Notice W.P.No.8076 of 2026 2021-2022

19.07.2024

13.05.2024 W.P.No.8082 of 2026 2020-2021

19.07.2024

13.05.2024 W.P.No.8107 of 2026 2018-2019

18.04.2024

28.12.2023 W.P.No.8111 of 2026 2019-2020

19.07.2024

13.05.2024

¶4The impugned orders have been passed since the Petitioner has failed to respond to the respective Notices in Form GST DRC – 01.

¶5The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner was unaware of the respective impugned orders as also the impugned Notices that preceded the respective impugned orders and has thus suffered the respective impugned orders.

¶6It is submitted that the Petitioner became aware of the respective impugned orders only after the recovery proceedings were initiated after the Petitioner's bank account was attached and a sum of Rs.3,66,973/- was recovered.

¶7In this connection, a reference was made to payment receipt of GST challan dated 19.01.2026, a total sum of Rs.3,66,973/- towards the tax amount of Rs.3,26,924/- and towards interest amount of Rs.40,049/-.

¶8The learned Government Advocate for the 1st Respondent is however unable to confirm whether the aforesaid tax payment receipt dated

19.01.2026 which is relating to any of the tax periods for which the tax demand has been confirmed vide the respective impugned orders.

¶9Considering the above, the impugned orders are quashed and the cases are remitted back to the 1st Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶10It is informed that a sum of Rs.30,98,969/- is marked as lien and the same may be lifted from the Petitioner's bank account.

¶11Considering the same, the attachment of the Petitioner's bank account shall stands lifted subject to adjustment of Rs.5,00,000/- from the aforesaid amount. Thereafter, the Petitioner shall establish that the recovery made on 19.01.2026 for a sum of Rs.3,66,973/- was appropriated towards the Petitioner's bank account.

¶12In case the Petitioner is establishes the same, the Petitioner shall deposit another sum of Rs.2,50,000/- in cash within a period of thirty

(30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶13Within such time, the Petitioner shall also files a replies to the respective Show Cause Notices in GST DRC-01 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the respective impugned Orders as an addendum to the respective Show Cause Notices.

¶14In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the 1st Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶15It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the respective impugned Orders.

¶16In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the 1st Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if these Writ Petitions were dismissed in limine today.

¶17Needless to state, before passing any such order, the 1st Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶18These Writ Petitions stand disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

27.02.2026 jas To:

1.The Deputy State Tax Officer – 1, Alagapuram Assessment Circle, Salem, Tamil Nadu.

2.The Branch Manager, DBS Bank, Swarnapuri Branch 49 A, Advaitha Ashram Rd, Opp.New Bus Stand Road, Swarnapuri, Salem, Tamil Nadu – 636 004. W.P.Nos.8076,o8082,o8107oando8111oofo2026 C.SARAVANAN,oJ. jas oW.P.No.8076,o8082,o8107oando8111oofo2026 and oW.M.P.Nos.8739,o8740,o8743,o8744,o8767,o8768,o8968,o8776oando8777oofo 2026

27.02.2026

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.