- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 27 February 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 7137/2026
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application dated 19.02.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
¶2The petitioner had submitted an online application on 19.02.2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
¶3Mr. S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Mr.Venkatatesa Perumal, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice on behalf of the fourth respondent.
4.No prejudice will be caused to the respondents 2 and 3 if the said authorities are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections if any from the neighbouring land owners as well as any other party whom they deem it fit. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-
(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners and also to any other party, whom they deem it fit to enquire;
(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 2 and 3 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order;
(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the respondents 2 and 3, the fourth respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 27-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer Gobichettipalayam, Erode District.
2.The Thasildar Office of the Thasildar Land Survey Division, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District,
3.The Surveyor Land Survey Department, Office of the Thasildar Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District,
4.The Inspector of Police Sathyamangalam Police Station, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District. ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab
27-02-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. R.Dharmaram Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Revenue Divisional Officer Gobichettipalayam, Erode District. 2.The Thasildar Office of the Thasildar Land Survey Division, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District, 3.The Surveyor Land Survey Department, Office of the Thasildar Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District, 4.The Inspector of Police Sathyamangalam Police Station, Sathyamangalam Taluk, Erode District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 3rd Respondent to survey and measure the Petitioners land as per his Deeds of Sale Dated 12.11.2010 and 19.12.2024 registered as Document No.6512 of 2010 and 8413 of 2024 at the Office of SRO, Sathyamangalam. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Karthikeyan For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt Advocate For R1 to R3 Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Govt Advocate(Crl.Side) For R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.