VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Chandira v. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 February 2026
Bench
K.Rajasekarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 4510/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K.Rajasekar

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

28.12.2025 for the alleged offences under Sections 296(b) and 109 of BNS, which was subsequently altered to Section 103 of BNS, in Crime No.674 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 28.12.2025, at about 8.30 hours, a domestic quarrel arose between the petitioner and her husband (the deceased) Page2 of 5 and it is alleged that the petitioner attacked the deceased with a billhook, causing grievous injuries. The deceased subsequently succumbed to the injuries after three days while undergoing treatment at the Cuddalore Government Hospital. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been arrested purely on suspicion and she has not committed any offence. He further submitted that the petitioner is a woman and is ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 28.12.2025. He further submitted that the investigation in this case is pending. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5.Considering the nature of allegations and the other facts and circumstances of the case, and taking note of the fact that the petitioner is a woman and has been in judicial custody since 28.12.2025, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on Page3 of 5 executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Cuddalore, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10:30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [d] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 24-02-2026 GBI Page4 of 5 Note :

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

1.The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police O.T.Police

Station, Cuddalore. Cr.No. 674/2025.

2.The Judicial Magistrate Court No-II, Cuddalore.

3.Central Prison, Cuddalore.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o4510oofo2026 K.RAJASEKAR,oJ. GBI CRLoOPoNo.o4510oofo2026 24-02-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Chandira ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police O.T.Police Station, Cuddalore. Cr.No. 674/2025. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No. 674/2025 on the file of the Respondent Police For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Prabhu For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.