VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Santhosh v. The State Rep.By, the Inspector of Police,

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
20 February 2026
Bench
K.Rajasekarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 4277/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K.Rajasekar

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

09.12.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 5(1) read with Section 6(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 in Crime No.67 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶2The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the relative of the victim girl aged about 12 year. Taking advantage of the proximity of the victim girl, he committed penetrative sexual assault on the victim girl. Hence, Page2 of 6 the case has been registered.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and due to previous enmity, petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court and he is judicial custody from

09.12.2025. Hence, he prayed for the grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution's case and produced the copy of the statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 183 of BNSS. He further submitted that investigation in this case was concluded and the charge sheet is yet to be filed. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the records, including the FIR and the statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 183 of BNSS.

¶6On a perusal of the statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 183 of BNSS, revealed certain facts, however, in the statement, victim girl has not mentioned anything about penetrative sexual assault. Further, considering the other facts and circumstances of the case, the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner and the stage of investigation, I am inclined to grant Page3 of 6 bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Tiruvallur and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [d] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be Page4 of 6 registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 20-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order gbi To

1.The Inspector of Police, W28, AWPS Ambattur Police Station, Tiruvallur.

¶2The Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Tiruvallur.

¶3The Central Prison, Puzhal.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. Note :

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. CRLoOPoNo.o4277oofo2026 K.RAJASEKAR,oJ. JAI CRLoOPoNo.o4277oofo2026 20-02-2026 Page5oofo6 Page6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR Santhosh ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, W28, AWPS Ambattur Police Station, Tiruvallur. Cr.No.67 of 2025. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.67 of 2025 on the file of W28, AWPS Ambattur Police Station, Tiruvallur. For Petitioner(s): Mr.J.A.Mohammad Imthiyaz For Respondent(s): Dr.C.E.Pratap. GA (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.