VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M.Ranganathan v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
19 February 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 6582/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to survey, demarcate and put-up wire fencing for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application, dated

05.01.2026 with the assistance of the 3rd respondent.

¶2The petitioner had submitted an application through on-line on

05.01.2026 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal, Page No.2 of 6 learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), accepts notice on behalf of the 3rd respondent. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 4 to 6 in this writ petition, notice to the respondents 4 to 6 is dispensed with by this Court.

¶4With regard to the prayer sought for in this writ petition, namely for putting up wire fencing with the assistance of the 3rd respondent, the same cannot be granted by this Court through this writ petition and if at all the same can be redressed only through a civil suit.

¶5No prejudice would be caused to any of the respondents, if the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections, if any, from the respondents 4 to 6, the neighbouring land owners and any other party as they deem fit within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 1 and 2 are directed to issue notice to the respondents 4 to 6, the neighbouring land owners, and Page No.3 of 6 also to any other party, if they deem it fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 1 and 2 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, with the assistance of the 3rd respondent, if required, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) There shall be no order as to costs.

19.02.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp Page No.4 of 6 To

1.The Tahsildar, Kurinjipadi Taluk, Cuddalore District.

2.The Taluk Head Surveyor, Kurinjipadi Taluk, Cuddalore District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Kullanchavadi Police Station, Cuddalore District. Page No.5 of 6 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,

J.

sp

19.02.2026 Page No.6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.02.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M.Ranganathan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Kurinjipadi Taluk, Cuddalore District. 2.The Taluk Head Surveyor, Kurinjipadi Taluk, Cuddalore District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Kullanchavadi Police Station, Cuddalore District. 4.R.Sivakumar 5.D.Sathivel 6.D.Veerupalingam ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 2 to consider the petitioner representation dated 05.01.2026 and thereby direct the respondents 1 and 2 to measure the property for put up wire fencing with the help of 3rd respondent police and erect the mile stones in Page No.1 of 6 Survey No.617/1, to an extent of 2 Acer and 35 cents, as per the patta No.1276, situated at Puliyur East, Kurinjipadi Taluk, Cuddalore District. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Sundarapandiyan For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate [R1 & R2] Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Government Advocate (Crl.Side) [R3] Notice dispensed with [R4 to R6] *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.