Sangeetha v. The Commissioner of Police Tambaram

Order The petitioner, who is the wife of Vincent, submitted a representation dated 17.12.2025 stating that her marriage was solemnized on 12.07.2024 and that she has a five-month-old child. She is residing on the ground floor of her father-in-law's property. The petitioner's husband is employed with "PAY TM", a private company, and is working in Bangalore. According to the petitioner, on

25.06.2025, being the wedding anniversary of her father-in-law and mother-in-law, certain celebrations were held at their residence. On that day, at about 10:00 p.m., a group of Police personnel and guards allegedly entered the petitioner's house, searched the premises in connection with her husband, and subjected the family members to abuse and harassment in the presence of their relatives, thereby causing humiliation. It is further stated that the Police personnel entered the house without authorization and failed to provide valid reasons for such entry and search. Despite the petitioner submitting a representation regarding the said harassment, no action was taken, which led to the filing of the present writ petition. Page3 of 4

¶2The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that, based on the allegations, the petitioner's husband appeared before the respondent Police on

16.03.2026, furnished his details, and gave an undertaking that he would cooperate with the investigation and appear as and when required. It was further submitted that the petitioner's husband is a suspect in a case involving the sale of drugs and narcotics to college students, and therefore, his movements are required to be monitored.

¶3Considering the submissions made on both sides, and in view of the fact that the petitioner's husband has furnished his details and expressed willingness to cooperate with the enquiry, the respondent Police have also undertaken that, as long as the petitioner's husband cooperates with the investigation, there shall be no necessity to enter the petitioner's residence in search of him.

¶4Recording the said undertaking, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 24-03-2026 RKP Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Page4 of 4 M.NIRMAL KUMAR J. RKP To

¶1The Commissioner of Police Tambaram Police Commissionerate, Karapakkam, Elcot Sez, Shollinganallur, Chennai - 600 119.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Special Team, Chromepet Police Station, Chennai - 600044.

¶3The Inspector of Police, Kundrathur PEW, Chennai - 600 069.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Madras. 24-03-2026

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR Sangeetha ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police Tambaram, Police Commissionerate, Karapakkam, Elcot Sez, Shollinganallur, Chennai - 600 119. 2. The Inspector of Police, Special Team, Chromepet Police Station, Chennai - 600044. 3. The Inspector of Police, Kundrathur PEW, Chennai - 600 069. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent police or their subordinates not to harass the petitioner and her family members in the guise of investigation/search. Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Kishore Kumar For Respondent(s): M/s. Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam, Additional Public Prosecutor