VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Priyadharshini Radhakrishnan v. Kabileshwaran Ramakrishnan

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
4 June 2026
Bench
S Justice T.V.Thamilselviauthor
Case no.
TR CMP 154/2026

Judgment

ORDER This petition has been filed to withdraw the petition in H.M.O.P.No.1005 of 2025 pending before the Subordinate Judge, Alandur, Chengalpattu District to the Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam, Villupuram District.

2.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.

3.Despite name printed in the cause list, there is no representation on the side of the respondent.

4.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is residing with her aged mother and brother. The petitioner's father died and her mother is a sick person and her brother is also suffering from kidney disease and he is undergoing dialysis twice in a week. He further submits that without any assistance and guidance, the petitioner is unable to travel to the Subordinate Judge, Alandur, Chengalpattu District to attend Court proceedings. Further, the physical health condition will not support the petitioner to travel. The travelling distance between petitioner's residence and the Subordinate Judge, Alandur, Chengalpattu District is 160 kms. Therefore, he prays to transfer the case from Subordinate Judge, Alandur, Chengalpattu District to the Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam, Villupuram District. Page3 of 4

5.I have gone through the affidavit filed in support this petition and I find no merit in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner/wife.

6.On perusal of records, it is seen that the respondent filed a petition in H.M.O.P.No.1005 of 2025 seeking restitution of conjugal rights. The respondent is working in a private concern at Pallavaram. The petitioner-wife is demanding more money from the resopndent-husband. Instead of reunion with the respondent, the petitioner filed a DVC complaint against the respondent.

7.The reason assigned by the petitioner is not justifiable. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to transfer the case from the Subordinate Judge, Alandur, Chengalpattu District to the Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam, Villupuram District. However, this Court directs the Subordinate Judge, Alandur, Chengalpattu District to conduct mediation between the petitioner and the respondent.

8.Accordingly, this transfer civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed. No costs. Connected, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 04-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order pam Page4 of 4

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J. pam To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Alandur, Chengalpattu District.

2.The Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam, Villupuram District. TR.C.M.P.No.154 of 2026 and C.M.P.No.5202 of 2026 04-06-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI TR.C.M.P.No.154 of 2026 and C.M.P.No.5202 of 2026 Priyadharshini Radhakrishnan W/o.Kabileshwaran, No 23, Kolliyankunam Village, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs Kabileshwaran Ramakrishnan S/o.Ramakrishnan, No.9, GP Madhavan Street, Dharga Road, Pallavaram, Chennai - 600 043. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of C.P.C., praying to withdraw and transfer the petition in H.M.O.P.No.1005 of 2025 pending before the Subordinate Judge, Alandur, Chengalpattu District to the Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam, Villupuram District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Machavatharan For Respondent(s): No appearance Page2 of 4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.