- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 13 March 2026
- Bench
- M.Dhandapani
- Case no.
- WP 9588/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the show Page3 of 6 cause notice dated 05.03.2025 issued by the respondents as if the petitioners have occupied the temple properties and subsequently, they have obtained ryotwari patta and conducted buildings.
¶2When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondents have passed the final order in the issue and this Court may grant liberty to the petitioner to challenge the final order dated 05.11.2025 passed by the respondents.
¶3In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to challenge the final order dated 05.11.2025 in the manner known to law.No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 13-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RLI Page4 of 6
¶1The Commissioner of Land Administrator Ezhilagam Chepauk, Chennai 600 005
¶2The District collector Collectorate, tiruvaruru Distrct, Tiruvarur
¶3The revenue Divisional officer Office of the RDO Tiuvarur District
¶4The Tahsildar Koothanallur and Post,
¶5The Special Tahsildar (nathamNilavarithittam), Koothanallur Taluk,
¶6The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Nagapattinam
¶7The Executive officer Arulmigu Sundareeswarar Temple, Thirupanipettai, Koothallur Taluk, Tiruvaur District Page5 of 6
M.DHANDAPANI, J. RLI 13-03-2026 Page6 of 6
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI 1. B.Chitra 2. N. Vedhamurthy 3. K. Sellaiyan 4. P.Saravanan 5. C. Moovendan 6. P. Kuttimani 7. C. Chozhan 8. K. Madhavan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner of Land Administrator Ezhilagam Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 2. The District collector Collectorate, tiruvaruru Distrct, Tiruvarur 3. The revenue Divisional officer Office of the RDO Tiuvarur District 4. The Tahsildar Koothanallur and Post, Page2 of 6 5. The Special Tahsildar (Natham Nilavarithittam), Koothanallur Taluk, 6. The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, Nagapattinam 7. The Executive officer Arulmigu Sundareeswarar Temple, Thirupanipettai, Koothallur Taluk, Tiruvaur District ..Respondent(s) The writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified Mandamus, Calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the Joint Commissioner, the 6th respondent herein, in M.P. No 165/ 2025 / C.2 dated 5.3.2025, M.P. no 148 / 2025 / C.2 / dated 5.3.2025, M.P. no 147/2025/ C.2/ dated 5.3.2025, MP.No 164/2025/ C.2 / dated 5.3.2025, MP.No 141 /2025/ C.2 / dated 5.3.2025, MP.No 167/2025/ C.2 / dated 5.3.2025, MP.No 160 /2025/ C.2 / dated 5.3.2025, MP.No 126/2025/ C.2 / dated 5.3.2025 and to quash the same consequently direct the Joint commissioner, the 6th respondent herein, as not to interfere in the lawful and peaceful possession of the housing sites for which the pattas were issued to the petitioners under the natham nilavari thittam by the government of Tamil nadu. For Petitioner(s): Mr. K.M.Subramanian For Respondent(s): Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, SGP RR6 & 7 Mr.S.Rajesh, GA RR1 to 5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.