VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

C.Murthy v. The Principal Secretary to the Government of Tamilnadu,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 March 2026
Bench
P.T. Ashaauthor
Case no.
WP 7323/2026

Judgment

ORDER The writ petition has been filed seeking a mandamus to the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 29.12.2025.

¶2The petitioner would submit that his father C.Chandrappa died in harness on 28.04.2021 while he was in service as Night Watchman at Thally Panchayat Union, Krishnagiri, leaving behind his wife Muniyamma and his two sons. The petitioner is his elder son and his younger son is Santhosh Kumar. Claiming disbursement of death benefits of his father, the petitioner's younger brother had submitted a representation to the respondents on 12.06.2023. Since no orders have been passed by the respondents, the petitioner had submitted one more representation on 29.12.2025. However, the same is also not considered till date. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶3The petitioner would submit that though his father had joined the services initially on NMR pay roll in the year 2002, he was promoted to the post of Night Watchman on 26.06.2008 and his scale of pay was revised and refixed as per G.O.Ms.No.234 Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 01.06.2009. Page3 of 4 Hence, the present representation was filed seeking disbursement of Special Provident Fund (SPF), Earned Leave, Unearned Leave and CPS and arrear of pension, based on the refixation of pay.

¶4The grievance of the petitioner is that his father who is a Government servant had died in the year 2021 and even after a lapse of 4 1/2 years, his family members are not able to avail the benefits, which they are entitled to.

¶5Heard the learned counsel on either side and also perused the materials placed before this Court.

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the limited scope of prayer sought for in this writ petition, this Court without going into the merits of the case, directs the respondent concerned to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass orders within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 03-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Page4 of 4 DS

P.T.ASHA, J. DS To:

¶1The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

¶2The Assistant Director Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department Krishnagiri.

¶3The District Collector Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri. 03-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA C.Murthy S/o. Late Chandrappa Door No.3/4, Avalpalli Village and post, Hossur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Principal Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2. The Assistant Director Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department Krishnagiri. 3. The District Collector Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri. ..Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 29.12.2025 and disburse the death benefits viz., Special Provident Fund (SPF) Earned Leave, Unearned Leave, Contributory Pension, Scheme and arrears of Pension together with interest and pass orders. Page2 of 4 For Petitioner: Ms.T.Hemalatha For Respondents: Mr.T.Chandrasekaran Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.