VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Sasikumar S v. The Tahsildar

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
25 February 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 7384/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, based on his online application dated 19.01.2026 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner had submitted an online application on 19.01.2026 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr. R. P. Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. Mr.Venkatatesa Perumal, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) accepts notice on behalf of the third respondent. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 4 to 7, notice to the respondents 4 to 7 is dispensed with by this Court.

4.No prejudice will be caused to the respondents 1 and 2 if the said authority is directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner's property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections of the respondents 4 to 7 and neighbouring land owners if any as well as any other third party, whom they deem it fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:-

(a) Before surveying the lands in question, the respondents 1 and 2 is directed to issue notice to the respondents 4 to 7 and any neighbouring land owners as well as any other third party, whom they deem it fit to enquire.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the respondents 1 and 2 shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the respondents 1 and 2, the third respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 25-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To

1.The Tahsildar Anaicut Taluk, Vellore district 632 101

2.The Head Surveyor Anaicut Taluk, Vellore district 632 101

3.The Inspector of Police C3 Pallikonda Police station, Pallikonda bus stop, Vellore district 635 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

25-02-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. Sasikumar S Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Anaicut Taluk, Vellore district 632 101 2.The Head Surveyor Anaicut Taluk, Vellore district 632 101 3.The Inspector of Police C3 Pallikonda Police station, Pallikonda bus stop, Vellore district 635 4.Kumaran 5.Loganathan 6.Renunathan 7.Aranganathan Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondents 1 and 2 to survey the petitioners property in old survey number 80/3 new survey number 80/3B measuring an extent of 0.4.97 Ares in Patta No. 40 respectively situated at Okkanapuram Village, Anaicut Taluk, Vellore district and fix its boundaries as per revenue records by obtaining adequate police protection from the 3rd respondent within the period that may be stipulated by this Honble court For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Arun Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For R1 and R2 Mr.R.Venkatesa Perumal Govt Advocate For R3

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.