- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 25 February 2026
- Bench
- K.Rajasekar
- Case no.
- CRL OP 4664/2026
Judgment
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on
29.11.2025, for the alleged offence punishable under Section 87 of BNS and section 5(l) and 6(1) of POCSO Act and section 9 of Prevention of Child Page2 of 6 Marriage Act, 2206 in Crime No.104 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
¶2The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner herein is aged about 19 years and developed a contact with the victim girl aged about 16 years and seduced her under the pretext of loving her, kidnapped her to Bangalore and committed aggravated penetrative sexual assault and in the meantime the family members of the victim girl have lodged the complaint and the police have investigated and rescued the victim and registered the case.
¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is only aged about 19 years and it is a case of adolescent love and the petitioner is in incarceration from 29.11.2025 and is ready to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the investigation in this case is pending. He has also produced the copy of the statement recorded from the victim girl under section 183(5) of BNS to substantiate the case. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. Page3 of 6
¶5Considering the fact that the victim girl is aged about 16 ½ years and the petitioner is aged about 19 years and the statement of the victim girl revealed various facts and though it is a case of aggravated penetrative sexual assault considering the fact that final report in this case is filed and considering the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Dharmapuri, and on further conditions that:- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the Trial Court daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; Page4 of 6 [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. 25-02-2026 MPA Note:
¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. Page5 of 6 To
¶1The Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Dharmapuri.
¶2The State Rep. by, Inspector of Police, Mahendramangalam Police Station, Dharmapuri District. Crime No.104 of 2025
3.The Officer, Incharge, District Jail, Dharmapuri.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o4664oofo2026 K.RAJASEKAR,oJ. MPA CRLoOPoNo.o4664oofo2026 25-02-2026 Page6oofo6
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Elumalai S/o. Madesh, D.No.4/444, Panchali Nagar Village, Rayakottai, Thenkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by, Inspector of Police, Mahendramangalam Police Station, Dharmapuri District. Crime No.104 of 2025 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS Act, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest concern in Crime No.104 of 2025 on the file of Inspector of Police, Mahendramangalam Police Station, Dharmapuri District, on such terms and conditions and as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): M/S.C.Prabakaran For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate(Crl. Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.