VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Jp Industries v. Assistant Commissioner (St) (Fac)

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
10 March 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
WP 9107/2026

Judgment

ORDER Mrs.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinkaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondent.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 10.09.2025, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 03.06.2025 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 10.09.2025.

¶4It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 03.03.2026.

¶5At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 25% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication. Page3 of 5

¶6The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:- "Petitioner willing to pay 25% of the matter is remanded back to the respondent."

¶7Recording the above submission, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶8Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 03.06.2025 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

10.09.2025 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 03.06.2025.

¶9In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated. Page4 of 5

¶10It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶11In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.

¶12Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶13This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

10.03.2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order kmm To Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Krishnagiri-2 Assessment Circle, Collectorate office back side, Krishnagiri, Tamil nadu. Page5 of 5

C.SARAVANAN, J. kmm W.P.No.9107 of 2026

10.03.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.03.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN W.P.No.9107 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.9829 & 9831 of 2026 JP Industries, Rep. by its proprietor Dhanaramchoudary Vajarampatel, 199, Theerthagiri Kottai, Chinnapanamutlu,Krishnagiri - 635201. ..Petitioner Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC), Krishnagiri-2 Assessment Circle, Collectorate office back side, Krishnagiri, Tamil nadu. ..Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order in GSTIN: 33AEAPV0497E1ZK (FY 2021-22) dated 10.09.2025 passed by the Respondent and its consequential Demand Order dated 10.09.2025 having Reference No. ZD3309251146790 issued by the Respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.Sanskar Samdaria For Respondent : Mrs.Amirtha Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Advocate. Page2 of 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.