VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Jenitha Indira Kumari v. Indian Overseas Bank

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 March 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 8679/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

ORDER This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents herein to forthwith restore debit and credit operation in respect of the petitioners saving Account No.027001000033434 maintained with the 3rd respondent Branch, unless the respondents are above to produce a valid court issued attachments or garnishee order authorising such restriction, consequently direct the respondents to act strictly in accordance with law.

¶2It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner have been maintaining a savings account with the 3rd respondent Bank. Without issuing any prior notice, the respondent has restricted/frozen the operation of the said account for several months. Therefore, the petitioner made a representation on 12.11.2025 to the respondent and the same is not considered. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to restore the debit and credit operations in respect of petitioner's savings account.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court may direct the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioners representation within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

¶4Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record. Since no adverse order is passed against the respondents, notice to them is dispensed with.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the limited request sought for by the petitioner, this court directs the third respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 12.11.2025 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 06-03-2026 rli Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To

1.Indian Overseas Bank Rep. by its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Central office No.763, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002

2.The Principal Nodal Officer Indian Overseas Bank, Customer Service Department, Central Office, Door No.763, Anna Salai, Chennai-600

3.the Branch Manager Indian Overseas Bank, Chintamani Branch, Anna Nagar 1st Avenue, Chennai-600 102 M.DHANDAPANI J. rli 06-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP No. 9359 of 2026 Jenitha Indira Kumari Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Indian Overseas Bank Rep. by its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Central office No.763, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002 2.The Principal Nodal Officer Indian Overseas Bank, Customer Service Department, Central Office, Door No.763, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002 3.the Branch Manager Indian Overseas Bank, Chintamani Branch, Anna Nagar 1st Avenue, Chennai-600 102 Respondent(s) PRAYER; This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, direction to the respondents herein to forthwith restore debit and credit operation in respect of the petitioners saving Account No.027001000033434 maintained with the 3rd respondent Branch, unless the respondents are above to produce a valid court issued attachments or garnishee order authorising such restriction, consequently direct the respondents to act strictly in accordance with law For Petitioner(s): Mr.H.Sekaran for M/s.Hs Law Firm For Respondent: NDW

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.