VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

K. Veerachamy (M/44) v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 February 2026
Bench
K.Rajasekarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 4834/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioners, who apprehends arrest by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 24 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, 1937 in Crime No.76 of 2026 seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the first petitioner/A1 is running a bar and the second petitioner/A2 is in charge of the bar. It is alleged that the liquor consumption was being permitted in violation of the prescribed conditions and beyond the time permitted by the Government. Hence, the case has been registered.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigation and ready to abide by any other stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned. Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the first petitioner is having 10 previous case and the second petitioner is having 4 previous cases. Page2 of 6 He further submitted that investigation in this case is completed . However, opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶5Considering the submissions made by both sides; allegations levelled against the petitioner; that investigation in this case is completed and all other factors this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned V Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition:

(a) If the petitioners fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Page3 of 6 Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioners shall report before the Trial Court everyday at 10:30 a.m for a period of three weeks and thereafter appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation;

(d) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560];

(e) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS. 26-02-2026 smn To

1.The Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, Chennai,

¶2The Inspector of Police, K-8 Arumbakkam Police Station, Chennai 600 106.

3.The Public ProsecutorHigh Court of Madras. Page4 of 6 Page5 of 6 CRLoOPoNo.o4834oofo2026 K.RAJASEKAR,oJ. smn CRLoOPoNo.o4834oofo2026 26-02-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR 1.K. Veerachamy S/o. Koothaiya 2. L. Ravindran @ Ravi S/o Latchumanan ..Petitioners Vs State rep by The Inspector of Police, K-8 Arumbakkam Police Station, Chennai 600 106. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: To enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of their arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.76 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, K-8 Arumbakkam Police Station, Chennai and pass orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr.J. Manikandan For Respondent(s): M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) Page1 of 6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.