VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

A.Sathyamurthy v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
12 March 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 8860/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to upload survey No.204/1B as per patta No.706 in the e-patta for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition based on the petitioner's representation within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Since the earlier representation was given by the petitioner through the legal notice, the petitioner will have to submit a fresh representation to the second respondent.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner is willing to give a fresh representation.

¶3Mr. S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the necessary parties within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶5This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.

¶6For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the second respondent, requesting the second respondent to upload survey No.204/1B as per patta No.706 in the e-patta for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the said representation from the petitioner within the stipulated time, the second respondent is directed to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of the necessary parties within a period of twelve weeks thereafter.

¶7Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 12-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To

1.The District Collector Chengalpet District, Collectorate, G.S.T. Road Chengalpet 603 001

2.The Tahasildhar Tambaram Taluk office, G.S.T. Road, Tambaram, Chenani 600 045 Chengalpattu District

3.The Taluk surveyor Tambaram Taluk office, G.S.T. Road, Tambaram, Chenani 600 045 Chengalpattu District ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

12-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. A.Sathyamurthy Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Chengalpet District, Collectorate, G.S.T. Road Chengalpet 603 001 2.The Tahasildhar Tambaram Taluk office, G.S.T. Road, Tambaram, Chenani 600 045 Chengalpattu District 3.The Taluk surveyor Tambaram Taluk office, G.S.T. Road, Tambaram, Chenani 600 045 Chengalpattu District Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 2nd Respondent to upload Survey no 204/ 1B as Per Patta No 706 New Survey No 204/1B of Mambakkam Village, in the e-patta in respect of schedule mentioned property For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.D.Mohan Ram For Respondent(s): Mr. S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.