- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 9 April 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 12808/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the Page2 of 5 respondents 1 and 2 to delete the name of petitioner's vendor's brother from the patta and "A" Register for the property more fully disclosed in the prayer to the writ petition.
¶2According to the petitioner, she is the absolute owner of the property more fully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. However, in the patta issued for the said property, the name of the petitioner's vendor's brother is included and it also appears in the "A" Register. The petitioner seeks for deletion of the petitioner's vendor's name from the patta as well as from the "A" Register. The petitioner submitted a representation on 08.01.2026 to the respondents, for the aforesaid purpose. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
¶3Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation, as stated above, is directed to be disposed of by the respondents, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing all the necessary parties, which includes the petitioner's vendor's brother, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. Page3 of 5
¶5This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.
¶6For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner's representation dated 08.01.2026, seeking for the deletion of the name of the petitioner's vendor's brother from the patta and "A" Register, more fully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of all necessary parties, including the petitioner's vendor's brother, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶7With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 09-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RKA Page4 of 5 To
¶1The District Collector District Collectorate, Dharmapuri-636 705.
¶2The Revenue Divisional officer Office of the RDO Dharmapuri-636 705.
¶3The Tahsildar Nallampalli Taluk Office, Dharmapuri-636 807. WPoNo.o12808oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSE,oJ. RKA WPoNo.o12808oofo2026 09-04-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Chinnathayi W/o.Manickam No.3/151,Parappatti (Kurinjipuram), Pangunatham Post, Indur, Dharmapuri District-636803. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector District Collectorate, Dharmapuri-636 705. 2. The Revenue Divisional officer Office of the RDO Dharmapuri-636 705. 3. The Tahsildar Nallampalli Taluk Office, Dharmapuri-636 807. ..Respondent(s) Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the Petitioners representation, dated 08.01.2026, within a time frame and pass orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Pugazvendan For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander, Special Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.