VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Vinayagam v. The State Rep By, the Inspector of Police,

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
27 February 2026
Bench
K.Rajasekarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 5051/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow K.Rajasekar

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

05.02.2026, for the alleged offence punishable under Section 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 309(4), 311, 351(3) of BNS Act in Crime No.53 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 5

¶2The allegation against the petitioner is that he, along with other accused, was involved in the robbery of a sum of Rs.750/- from the defacto complainant at knife point. It is further alleged that the petitioner attacked the de facto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the present case has been registered.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the case has been registered only for statistical purposes and that, since the petitioner has some previous cases, he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that it is a case of robbery and that the petitioner is having 13 previous cases of similar nature. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶5This Court has perused the FIR and the other connected materials available on record. Though it is stated that the petitioner has some previous cases, considering the period of incarceration, the manner in which the FIR came to be registered, and the other circumstances, this Court is inclined to Page3 of 5 grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur, and on further conditions that:- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the Trial Court daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Page4 of 5 Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S. 27-02-2026 MPA Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

1.The Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur.

¶2The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, T-2, Ambattur Estate Police Station, Tiruvallur District.

3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal-II.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o5051oofo2026 K.RAJASEKAR,oJ. MPA CRLoOPoNo.o5051oofo2026 27-02-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Vinayagam S/o.Srinivasan, Residing at No.29, Ayothi Kovil Street, Padi, Tiruvallur District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, T-2, Ambattur Estate Police Station, Tiruvallur District. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of the arrest in Cr.No.53/2026 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s): A.Samson For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate(Crl. Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.