VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

A.Pounammal v. The State of Tamil Nadu

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 April 2026
Bench
Krishnan Ramasamyauthor
Case no.
WP 13068/2021

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to pay compensation for the acquired lands belonging to the petitioner, comprised in Survey Nos.297 / 11B3, 297 ./11B7,297/ 11B9, 307 /9E, 308/ 3B, 308/5, 308/ 9C, 316/ 13/B, 316/ 15A1, 316 /7A, 317 /11C, 356/ 6B described in patta No.85 comprised in the extent of 79.50 Acres and in Survey No.308/6 comprised at extent of 14.50 acres described in patta No.1662 situated at Kottarai village, Alathur Taluk, Perambalur District.

¶2There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶3On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that in this case, the petitioner had given representation for the purpose of fixing compensation for acquisition of subject land. Further, he would submit that already the compensation was determined and the joint pattadharar had already received their share of compensation for the aforementioned acquired portion of land. Hence, he prays for dismissal of this petition.

¶4Heard the learned counsel for the respondents and also perused the entire materials available on record.

¶5In the case on hand, the petitioner had given representation for the purpose of fixing compensation for acquisition of subject land. However, according to the respondents, the respondents had already determined the compensation for the acquired portion of land and deposited the compensation amount to the Revenue Authorities. Further, it was brought to the knowledge of this Court that the joint pattadharars of the subject land had already received their share of compensation for the acquired portion of land.

¶6In view of the above, the 4th respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 05.03.2020, which was filed before the 2nd respondent-District Collector and after issuing due notice to the petitioner, dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 09-04-2026 nsa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To

1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government,Public works Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600009.

2.The District Collector, Perambalur District, Perambalur.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Perambalur.

4.The Tahsildar, Alathur Taluk, Alathur, Perambalur Taluk.

5.The Assistant Executive Engineer (PWD / WRO), Maruthaiyaru Basin Sub Davision, Perambalur. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa

09-04-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY A.Pounammal W/o.Azhagappan, No.78, Saravana Perumal 1st Street, Saravana Perumal Koil Street, Purasawalkam,, Chennai 600007. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to Government,Public works Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600009. 2.The District Collector, Perambalur District, Perambalur. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Perambalur. 4.The Tahsildar, Alathur Taluk, Alathur, Perambalur Taluk. 5.The Assistant Executive Engineer (PWD / WRO), Maruthaiyaru Basin Sub Davision, Perambalur. 6.D.Azhagappan, S/o.Duraisamy Padaiyachi, Kottarai village, Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, To direct the respondents to pay compensation for the acquired lands belonging to me comprised in Survey No.297 / 11B3, 297 ./11B7,297/ 11B9, 307 /9E, 308/ 3B, 308/5, 308/ 9C, 316/ 13/B, 316/ 15A1, 316 /7A, 317 /11C, 356/ 6B describd in patta No.85 comprised in the extend of 79,50 acres and in Survey 308/6 comprised at extend of 14.50 acres described in patta 1662 situated at Kottarai village, Alathur Taluk, Perambalur District within time frame. For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Gowthamaraj, GA for R1 to 5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.