- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 March 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 8676/2026
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to issue computerized patta in the name of the petitioner for the properties morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 03.09.2025.
¶2The petitioner claims that he is the absolute of the properties morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. He seeks for issuance of computer patta in his name for the subject properties. He had given a representation on 03.09.2025 to the respondents for the said purpose. Since the same was not considered by the respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.
¶3Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with Page No.2 of 4 law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.
¶5For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 4th respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation, dated 03.09.2025 seeking for issuance of computer patta for the properties morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition in the name of the petitioner, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner and after hearing the objections, if any, from all the necessary parties, whom the 4th respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶6With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
10.03.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp Page No.3 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,
J.
sp To
1.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Krishnagiri District – 653 113.
2.The Sub Collector, Collectorate Office, Krishnagiri District – 653 113.
3.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Office, Krishnagiri District – 653 113.
4.The Thasildar, Denkanikottai Taluk Office, Denkanikottai, Krishnagiri District.
10.03.2026 Page No.4 of 4
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.03.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Mani ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Collectorate Office, Krishnagiri District – 653 113. 2.The Sub Collector, Collectorate Office, Krishnagiri District – 653 113. 3.The District Revenue Officer, Collectorate Office, Krishnagiri District – 653 113. 4.The Thasildar, Denkanikottai Taluk Office, Denkanikottai, Krishnagiri District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03.09.2025 and the 4th respondent to issue computerised patta for the agriculture lands in survey number 974/5 measuring to an extent 0.40.0 Ares, 976/1 measuring to an extent 0.05.0 ares and 976/9 measuring to an extent 0.31.5 Ares agriculture lands at No.67, Nagamangalam Village, Denkanikottai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Page No.1 of 4 For Petitioner : Ms.K.Annamma For Respondents : Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Government Advocate *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.