- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 29 June 2026
- Bench
- Shamim Ahmed
- Case no.
- CRL MP 6275/2026
Judgment
ORDER
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 1001 days in filing the present Criminal Revision Case.
¶2In compliance of the order dated 10.06.2026, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has brought a demand draft for Rs.54,804/-, dated
29.06.2026, bearing Draft No.12518 in favour of the respondent P.Gunasekaran. He further submitted that earlier, the petitioner had deposited Rs.50,000/- before the trial court on 02.12.2020.
¶3He also submitted that pursuant to the garnishee proceedings, a sum of Rs.10,028/- per month for seven months, aggregating to Rs.70,196/- has been recovered from the petitioner's salary and paid towards the compensation awarded by the trial court. In compliance of the order dated 10.06.2026, total amount of Rs.1,75,000/- has been paid to the respondent and no amount is due against the petitioner. Thus he submitted that since the order has been complied Page3 of 5 with, the application for condoning the delay in filing the present criminal revision may be ordered and the present Criminal Revision may also be decided in terms of Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
¶4The original draft for sum of Rs.54,804/- is being handed over to the counsel for the respondent today in the court and the photostat copy of the same is taken on record .
¶5Learned Counsel for the respondent R. Hemalatha, submitted that now the entire amount of Rs.1,75,000/- has been received by the respondent and there is no amount due, thus she submitted that she has no objection in allowing this application and the Criminal Revision may also be decided in terms of exercising power under section147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
¶6Accordingly, in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondent, the delay of 1001 days in filing the Criminal Revision Case is hereby condoned.
¶7The Office is directed to allot regular number to Criminal Revision today itself and post the Criminal Revision for final disposal on 08.07.2026.
¶8The Respondent is directed to move an application before the trial court for withdrawal of Rs.50,000/- deposited by the petitioner on 02.12.2020 within a period of two weeks from today. If any such application is filed, the trial court Page4 of 5 is directed to release the amount of Rs.50,000/- in favour of the respondent within three weeks thereafter.
¶9On the next date of hearing, the parties shall file Memo of Compromise as they submitted that the parties have entered into a settlement.
29.06.2026 msr
To The Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under the SC/ST (POA) Act, Namakkal.
CRLoMPoNo.o6275oofo2026 SHAMIMoAHMED,oJ. omsr o o CRLoMPoNo.o6275oofo2026 in CRLoRCoSRoNO.o98284oOFo2025 29-06-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED in CRL RC SR NO. 98284 OF 2025 S.Vimalkumar S/o.Sudalaimuthu, No.4/46, Vazhavantha Amman Temple Street, Manimurthispuram, Tirunelveli, Working Address Govt High School, Kathivakkam, Ennore, Chennai 57. ..Petitioner(s) Vs P.Gunasekaran S/o.M.Balasubramaniam, 36/7, Pillayar Koil Street, Sooriyampalayam Post Office, Thiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District. ..Respondent(s) Crl.M.P.No.6275 of 2026: To condone the delay of 1001 days in filing Revision against the Judgment in C.A.No. 72/2020 by the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of cases under the SC/ST(POA) Act, Namakkal on 08.12.2022, and thus render justice. Crl.RC.SR.No.98284 of 2025: To call for the records and set aside the Judgment in C.A.No.72 of 2020 dated 08.12.2022 passed by the learned Page2 of 5 Sessions Judge, Special Court for Trial of Cases under the SC/ST (POA) Act, Namakkal, confirming the Judgment in STC.No.211 of 2016 dated 06.12.2017 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast TrackCourt), Tiruchengode. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Lal Devasagayam For Respondent(s): M/s. R.Hemalatha
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.