VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Daga Nagar Residents Welfare Association v. The District Collector

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 March 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 11849/2026

Judgment

ORDER The main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage. Since no adverse orders are passed as against the respondents 1, 3 to 7 and 10 to 13, notice to the said respondents are dispensed with.

¶2This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to remove the illegal cattle farm being run by the respondents 11 to 13 at Plot No. 14 and 15, Daga Nagar, Ayappakkam, Chennai 600 077 comprised in Survey no 324, Ayappakkam Village, Ambattur Taluk, Villivakkam Panchayat union, Page4 of 8 Thiruvallur District by considering the representation of the petitioner dated

19.12.2025.

¶3According to the petitioner, the petitioner – Association is a registered Society bearing registration no.167/2021 represented by its Secretary, situated in S.No.324, Ayapakkam Village, Ambattur Taluk, Villivakkam Panchayat Union, Thiruvallur District within the Chennai Metropolitan Planning Area, classified as Primary Residential Use Zone and approved vide CMDA Approval No.PPD/LO No.12/2013, however, the respondents 11 to 13, who own the residential plots in the said layout, have unlawfully converted the residential premises into the large area of cattle farm and objecting the same, the petitioner made a representation, however, no order has been passed, hence the present Writ Petition is filed.

¶4The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the cattle farm is an agricultural activity and the same is prohibited in the residential zone, even then, respondents 11 to 13 are running a cattle farm.

¶5Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 8 and 9 and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the 10th Page5 of 8 respondent would submit that unless the local Municipal Authorities or the Authorities of State Pollution Control Board are prohibiting the cattle farm, agricultural activity, there is no prohibition of the said activity in the residential zone. Hence the representation made by the Writ Petitioner cannot be considered.

¶6On going through the entire documents placed on record, it is seen that petitioner – Association is a registered Society, situated in S.No.324, Ayapakkam Village, Ambattur Taluk, Villivakkam Panchayat Union, Thiruvallur District, i.e., within the Chennai Metropolitan Planning Area, classified as Primary Residential Use Zone and approved vide CMDA Approval No.PPD/LO No.12/2013. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents 11 to 13, who own the residential plots in the layout, have unlawfully converted the residential area into the large area of cattle farm and objecting the same, the petitioner made a representation. On the other hand, the contention of the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 8 and 9 and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the 10th respondent is that, unless the local Municipal Authorities or the authorities of State Pollution Control Board are prohibiting the said activity, there is no prohibition for running the cattle farm in the residential zone. Page6 of 8

¶7Considering the above said facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 8 and 9 and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for 10th respondent that there is no prohibition for running a cattle farm and the representation made by the petitioner cannot be considered, the present writ petition seeking a direction to consider the representation, cannot be allowed and the present Writ Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. 30-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order ssd To

1.The District Collector Office of the District Collector, Thiruvallur

2.The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority "Thalamuthu - Natarajan Maaligai, No. 1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008 Page7 of 8

3.The Secretary to the Government Government of Tamilnadu Animal Husbandry, Dairying Fisheries and Fishermen Welfare,Integrated Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Campus, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035

4.The Secretary Department of Rural Development and Panchayath Raj Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009

5.The Director, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying, Fisheries and Fishermen Welfare, Integrated Animal Husbandry and Fisheries campus, Nandanam chennai 600 035

6.The Commissioner of Police Avadi Police Commissionerate, Avadi

7.The Tasildhar Ambattur Taluk, Chennai

8.The Block Development officer Ayappakkam Panchayat, Villivakkam Panchayat union, Ambattur, Chennai

9.The Special officer Ayappakkam Panchayat, Villivakkam Panchayat union, Ambattur, Chennai

10.The Inspector of Police Ayapakkam Police station, Ambattur, Chennai Page8 of 8

M.DHANDAPANI, J. ssd 30-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 11849 of 2026 & W.M.P.No.12938 of 2026 Daga Nagar Residents Welfare association Represented by its President Mr. N. Sivanraj having office at Plot No.17 K.C. Daga Nagar, Ayappakkam, Chennai 600 077 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Office of the District Collector, Thiruvallur 2. The Member Secretary Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority "Thalamuthu - Natarajan Maaligai, No. 1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008 3. The Secretary to the Government Government of Tamilnadu Animal Husbandry, Dairying Fisheries and Fishermen Welfare, Integrated Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Campus, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035 4. The Secretary Department of Rural Development and Panchayath Raj Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 Page2 of 8 5. The Director, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying, Fisheries and Fishermen Welfare, Integrated Animal Husbandry and Fisheries campus, Nandanam chennai 600 035 6. The Commissioner of Police Avadi Police Commissionerate, Avadi 7. The Tasildhar Ambattur Taluk, Chennai 8. The Block Development officer Ayappakkam Panchayat, Villivakkam Panchayat union, Ambattur, Chennai 9. The Special officer Ayappakkam Panchayat, Villivakkam Panchayat union, Ambattur, Chennai 10.The Inspector of Police Ayapakkam Police station, Ambattur, Chennai 11.Kannan S/o Jeyaram Pillai Plot No. 32, Daga Nagar, Ayappakkam, Chennai 600 077 12.Varalakshmi W/o Kannan, Plot No 32 Daga Nagar, Ayappakkam, Chennai 600 077 13.Vijaya Kumar S/o Kannan, Plot No 32 Daga Nagar, Ayappakkam, Chennai 600 077 ..Respondent(s) Page3 of 8 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to remove the illegal cattle farm being run by the respondents 11 to 13 at Plot Nos. 14 and 15, Daga Nagar, Ayappakkam, Chennai 600 077 comprised in Survey No. 324, Ayappakkam Village, Ambattur Taluk, Villivakkam Panchayat union, Thiruvallur District by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 19.12.2025 within a time frame. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.R.Udaya Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Sanjay Balachandar for CMDA / R2 Mr.J.C.Durairaj for R8 and R9 Additional Government Pleader Mr.V.Meganathan for R10 Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.