VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

R.Renuga Devi v. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.By

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
26 March 2026
Bench
M. Nirmal Kumarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 5677/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner / accused in Cr.No.425/2025 registered for the offences under Section 296(b) and 118(1) of BNS, has filed this quash petition.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the second petitioner is working as an Assistant Professor and is pursuing Ph.D and also preparing for the Government Examinations. The de facto complainant had an altercation with the first petitioner and attacked the first petitioner with stone and due to severe pain the first petitioner called the second petitioner for help and the petitioners 3 and 4 tried to stop the fight. Later the first and second petitioners lodged a case against the second respondent in Cr.No.424/2025 for the offences under Section 294(b), 118(1) of BNS. Thereafter, the second Page3 of 6 respondent colluded with the first respondent, had given a false complaint against the petitioners 1 to 4 in Cr.No.435/2025. Hence, he prays for quash.

¶3The learned Additional Public Prosecutor had filed a counter and in which it is stated as under: "On 26.12.2025, when Tr.K. Balamurugan, Sub-Inspector of Police, was on station duty at Jolarpet received from the Police Station, intimation was an Government Hospital, Tirupattur. Upon receiving the said intimation, proceeded to the Government Hospital, Tirupattur, with enquired where Purushothaman, aged about 45 years, the inpatient son of Puttan, residing at No. 1/111, V.M. Circle, Ammaiyappan Nagar, Jolarpet, Tirupattur District. After enquiry, his statement and, based on the same, returned to the police station and registered a case on 28.12.2025 at about 12.30 p.m.

¶3It is statement, respectfully submit the said Purushothaman that, in his stated that he resides at the above address along with his mother Kamala, aged about 80 years, and that he is employed with Zomato. He further stated that he is married but is presently living separately from his wife. On 26.12.2025 at about 09.00 a.m., when he came out of his house, he noticed that sanitary waste (Stayfree napkins) had been discarded on the road. At that time, certain Panchayat workers were collecting garbage and attempted to burn the waste along with the said sanitary waste. When he objected and told them not to light the fire as it might damage the tamarind tree near his house, Renuka Devi/A-lwho was present there, abused him in filthy language and made derogatory remarks about him and his wife.

¶4It is respectfully submit that, Parvathi/A-2, the daughter-in-law of Renuka Devi, caught hold of his shirt, pulled him, and slapped him on his right cheek. Subsequently, they also assaulted him on his back and hands Page4 of 6 with a stick belonging to his mother. Further, Venkatesan/A-3 and Lakshmanan/A-4, who came there under the pretext of separating them, also caught hold of him the complainant attempted to and assaulted him. When record the incident on his mobile phone, the accused persons snatched the phone from him. Thereafter, complainant managed to retrieve the phone and went to the Government Hospital, Tirupattur, wheeler, where the doctor provided admitted him as an inpatient. The on his two-treatment and

¶5It is respectfully submitted that, based on the complaint, a case was registered in Jolarpet Police Station, Crime No.425 of 2025, u/s.296(b), 118 (1) BNS against the accused on 28.12.2025 at about 12.30 hours by Tr.K.Balamurugan, the then Sub Inspector of Police and submitted before me for investigation."

3.1 He further submitted that it is the case in counter and on the petitioner's complaint, a case in Cr.No.424/2025, has been registered which is pending investigation. Both the cases are being investigated by following the Police Standing Order 566 and on conclusion of investigation, final report will be filed by following the Standing Orders and the decision of the Full Bench of this Court in T.Balaji and another Vs. The State rep. by the Inspector of Police and another in Crl.O.P.Nos.4587/2024 & batch dated 08.08.2024. Page5 of 6

¶4Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 26-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order BKN To: The Sub Inspector of Police, Jolarpet Police Station, CRLoOPoNo.o5677oofo2026 M.NIRMALoKUMAR,oJ. BKN CRLoOPoNo.o5677oofo2026 26-03-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR and Crl.M.P.No.4334 of 2026 1. R.Renuga Devi W/o.late.G.Rama Moorthy, No.1/112, Ammaiyappan Nagar, 2. D.Parvathi W/o.R.Madesh, Ammaiyappan Nagar, 3. M.Venkatesan S/o.Mani, Ammaiyappan Nagar, 4. M.Lakshmanan S/o.Masilamani, Ammaiyappan Nagar, ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by The Sub Inspector of Police, Jolarpet Police Station, Page2 of 6 2. P.Purushothoman S/o.Puttan, No.1/111, Ammaiyappan Nagar, ..Respondent(s) Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS to quash the FIR No.425 of 2025. For Petitioner(s): M/s.P.Saravana Moorthy For Respondent(s): Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor for R1

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.