VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

P.S.Keerthi v. K.Sivaraj

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
8 June 2026
Bench
M. Nirmal Kumarauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 7119/2026

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner who is the estranged wife of the respondent – K.Sivaraj, had filed this quash petition seeking to withdraw and transfer the DVC No.125 of 2023 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore to the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court – I, Poonamallee at Chennai and pass such further or Page2 of 6 other orders.

¶2The petitioner submits that she married the petitioner on 11.11.2019 at Poonamallee, Chennai and out of the wedlock, a female child – Tanvi was born to them on 25.02.2021. Now the child is aged about 5 years. Initially, both the petitioner and the respondent were residing at Bangalore and employed there. Subsequently, the respondent shifted to Chennai and employed with M/s Tech Mahindra. The respondent and his family members demanded dowry in the form of a car and a house. Hence, there was a dispute.

¶3On 20.02.2023 the respondent harassed the petitioner in front of the petitioner's brother and driven her out from the matrimonial home. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and the same was numbered as D.V.C.No.125 of 2023.

¶4The respondent has filed his counterblast as H.M.O.P.No.669 of 2024 for restitution of conjugal rights before the Family Court, Coimbatore.

¶5Now, the petitioner is residing at Chennai along with her minor daughter and she has to take care of her ailing parents, who are taking treatment at Chennai. Thus, it is difficult for the petitioner to attend the both the court Page3 of 6 proceedings at Coimbatore. It is further reported that the respondent also now residing at Chennai.

¶6Earlier when the domestic violence complaint was pending, the same was referred for mediation and during mediation the issue got resolved. The petitioner agreed to settle the dispute on condition that the respondent shall deposit a sum of Rs.7,25,000/- in the name of the minor child in a fixed deposit scheme, out of which the petitioner would receive a sum of Rs.16,000/- every quarter. The petitioner was also permitted to retain the 16 sovereigns of gold ornaments valued approximately Rs.16,00,000/- which were given by the respondent to the petitioner and to the minor child. Further it is reported that a sum of Rs.2,80,000/- was previously given to the petitioner. Now, the respondent had drawn a fixed deposit at the Karur Vysya Bank, Manavala Nagar Branch, Tiruvallur for a sum of Rs.7,25,000/- in the name of the minor child – Tanvi and arrayed the petitioner as joint holders. Thus, according to the respondent, during mediation, the issue got resolved. Now, the petitioner had made a turn and started demanding extra amount.

¶7The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the respondent had produced a copy of the fixed deposit receipt, original receipt was under the control of the respondent and even the quarterly credit amount of Rs.16,000/- has not been made. She further seeks short accommodation to Page4 of 6 verify with the same.

¶8Be that as it may, now both the petitioner and the respondent are residing at Chennai and the petitioner seeks for transfer of D.V.C.No.125 of 2023 from the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore to the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court – I, Poonamallee at Chennai. The respondent is also residing somewhere around Chennai and it will not be difficult for him to appear before the Judicial Magistrate – I, Poonamallee at Chennai. The only requirement of the respondent is that the fixed deposit amount of Rs.7,25,000/- and permitting the petitioner to retain the gold jewels have to be considered and also the mediation report has to be considered by the Court below.

¶9In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the proceedings in DVC No.125 of 2023 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore is withdrawn and transferred to the file of the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court – I, Poonamallee at Chennai, with all the records. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. 08-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Jer Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore.

¶2The Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Poonamalle at Chennai. CRLoOPoNo.o7119oofo2026 M.NIRMALoKUMAR,oJ. Jer CRLoOPoNo.o7119oofo2026 08-06-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR and Crl.M.P.No.5189 of 2026 P.S.Keerthi W/o.K.Sivaraj, 39B, 4th Street, Parathi Avenue, Sakthi Nagar, Porur, Chennai - 600116. ..Petitioner(s) Vs. K.Sivaraj S/o.Kaliyaperumal, No.F1 Arumugm Castle Thirumalai Homes Thalapathy Stalin, 1st Street Vengaivasai, Santhosapuram, Chennai - 600 073. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 447 of BNSS, to withdraw and transfer the DVC.No.125/2023 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore(1), Coimbatore to the Judicial Magistrate Court-I, Poonamalle at Chennai, and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner(s): Ms.K.Akshaya For Respondent(s): Ms.M.Muthu Yazhini

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.