VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.C.Prabakaran v. C.Thangavel

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 March 2026
Bench
S.Justice N. Malaauthor
Case no.
CMP 6281/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S.Justice N. Mala

Judgment

Order

(1) The petitioner has purchased the property measuring an extent of 600 sq.ft., in TS.No.28/2, Nallur Village, Block 49, Thennampalayam Extension RVE Layout, Tiruppur South Taluk, Tiruppur District, by virtue of a registered Sale Deed dated 04.12.2024, from the 3rd respondent herein. The petitioner states that his vendor, the 3rd respondent herein, purchased the property in an auction sale, vide Sale Certificate dated

24.01.2019, registered in the office of the Joint Sub Registrar-II, Tiruppur, on 22.04.2019, in Doc.No.2135/2019. The petitioner further states that he is the bona fide purchaser for value and after purchase, he mutated the Town Survey Land Register and tax assessments in his favour. The petitioner states that while so, without impleading the Page3 of 5 petitioner as a party, the 1st respondent herein, suppressing all the facts, filed EA.No.6/2025 in EP.No.13/2025, to set aside the exparte order dated 22.08.2022 in EA.No.55/2019. The Trial Court, without considering the facts and law, passed the impugned order, setting aside the Court auction sale conducted on 08.06.2018. The petitioner states that he became the absolute owner of the property as early as in the year 2024, whereas the application was filed in 2025, without impleading the petitioner as a party. The petitioner states that he is aggrieved by the order of the Trial Court dated 07.01.2026, made in EA.No.6/2025, and hence, as a a third party to the proceedings, he has sought leave to this Court to file the above Civil Revision Petition.

(2) From the perusal of the order dated 07.01.2026, in EA.No.6/2025, it is clear that the petitioner was not a party to the proceedings and therefore, this Court, being satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, is inclined to grant leave to the petitioner.

(3) Accordingly, leave is granted and the petition is ordered. 18-03-2026 AP Internet: Yes Page4 of 5 To

¶1C.Thangavel s/o.Chinnasamy alias Ramaboyan No.40/1, New No.31/20, RVE Layout 2nd street, Thennampalayam Palladam Road Tirupur

¶2Rajasekar S/o.Madhavan No.9/6, New No.15/6, MRC Ellaiamman Temple Kotoor Chennai-85 CMPoNo.o6281oofo2026 N.MALAoJ. AP CMPoNo.o6281oofo2026 AND CRPoSRoNO.o35169oOFo2026 18-03-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N. MALA AND CRP SR NO. 35169 OF 2026 S.C.Prabakaran S/o.Shanmugasundaram, No.38, Mangarai Amman Nagar Vijayapuram Post Tirupur District ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. C.Thangavel s/o.Chinnasamy alias Ramaboyan No.40/1, New No.31/20, RVE Layout 2nd street, Thennampalayam Palladam Road Tirupur 2. Rajasekar S/o.Madhavan No.9/6, New No.15/6, MRC Ellaiamman Temple Kotoor Chennai-85 ..Respondent(s) CRP SR No. 35169 of 2026 S.C.Prabakaran S/o.Karupannagounder, D.No.19B, Kamarajanar Street, West Tambaram, Chennai-45 ..Petitioner(s) Vs C.Thangavel Page2 of 5 ..Respondent(s) To grant leave to the petitioner to file Civil Revision Petition passed by this Honble Court For Appellant(s): R.Prabakar P.Marudhupandiyan S.Selvi S.Senthilkumar S.Ranjith Kumaran M.Sarada Devi S.Vignesh S.Nishath For Respondent(s):

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.