VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Soliswara Tex v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 March 2026
Bench
C. Saravananauthor
Case no.
8346/2026

Judgment

ORDER Mr.TNC. Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the Respondent.

¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondent.

¶3In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner has challenged the impugned Order dated 28.04.2024, which was preceded by a Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 23.12.2023 wherein the Petitioner was called upon to appear for personal hearing. However, the Petitioner had not taken advantage of the same and thus, suffered the impugned Order dated 28.04.2024.

¶4It is noticed that the limitation for filing an appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments, 2017 against the impugned Order has already expired. The present Writ Petition has been filed only on 24.02.2026. Page3 of 6

¶5At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 50% of the disputed tax as a condition for denovo adjudication.

¶6The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made a following endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:- "Agree to deposit 50% of disputed tax."

¶7Under similar circumstances, Orders have been quashed and cases have been remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on terms subject to such Assessee depositing 25% to 100% of the disputed tax depending upon the length of delay in approaching the Court. I do not find any reason to take a different view in this case.

¶8Therefore, to balance the interest of both parties viz., the Assessee and the Revenue, the case is remitted back to the Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page4 of 6

¶9Within such time, the Petitioner shall also file a reply to the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 dated 23.12.2023 together with requisite documents to substantiate the case by treating the impugned Order dated

28.04.2024 as an addendum to the Show Cause Notice dated 23.12.2023.

¶10In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply/pre-deposit. Subject to the Petitioner complying with the above stipulations, the attachment of the bank account of the Petitioner if any, shall also stand automatically vacated.

¶11It is made clear that bank attachment shall be lifted subject to the Petitioner depositing 50% of the disputed tax as ordered above and the Petitioner not being in arrears of any other amount for any other tax period barring the amount demanded under the impugned Order.

¶12In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today. Page5 of 6

¶13Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.

¶14This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 03-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order jv To The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Office of the Assistant Commissioner (ST), Palladam – I Circle, Palladam, Tiruppur III, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu-641 664. WPoNo.o8346oofo2026 C.SARAVANAN,oJ. JV WPoNo.o8346oofo2026 03-03-2026 Page6oofo6

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP Nos.9035 and 9037 of 2026 Soliswara Tex Represented by its Managing Partner Kanagaraj No. 1/179, Kirichi Palayam, Elavanthi Post, Palladam Tirupur, Tamil Nadu-641664 ..Petitioner(s) Vs The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Office of the Assistant Commissioner (ST), Palladam – I Circle, Palladam, Tiruppur III, Tiruppur, Tamil Nadu- 641 664. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the impugned order issued by the Respondent in Form GST DRC- 01 bearing RFN No. MA3312230546727 dated 23.12.2023 along with Order and Summary of Order in Form GST DRC-07 bearing Reference No. ZD330424227863F dated 28.04.2024 and the consequential impugned attachment notice issued by the Respondent in Form GST DRC -16 bearing GSTIN: 33ABVFS9973Q1ZP dated 29.01.2026 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondent to raise the attachment under the consequential impugned attachment notice issued by the Respondent in Form GST DRC -16 bearing GSTIN 33ABVFS9973Q1ZP dated 29.01.2026 and remand the matter to the Respondent directing them to entertain the records, documents and reply from Page2 of 6 the Petitioner and then pass order after affording a personal hearing to the Petitioner For Petitioner(s): Ms.Rukmani Venugopalan For Respondent(s): Mr.TNC. Kaushik, Additional Government Pleader

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.