VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Subashini v. The Superintendent of Police

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 April 2025
Bench
M.S. Rameshauthor, N.Senthilkumar
Case no.
HCP 434/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.S. RameshFollow N.Senthilkumar

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH, J.) The petitioner herein is the mother of two minor boys, namely, Rakshan, aged about 6 years and Thalapathy, aged about 4 years. According to the petitioner, the father / third respondent is illegally having custody of the children and refusing to permit the petitioner to visit the children and hence, present Habeas Corpus Petition is filed.

¶2As on date, the third respondent / husband is in custody of the children. Both the petitioner and the third respondent as well as the minor children are present before us. We are of the view that the matrimonial dispute between them to be resolved if they are subjected to mediation. Accordingly, the matter was referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to this Court on 21.03.2025. However, it is reported that the mediation failed.

¶3We heard the learned counsel appearing appearing for both the petitioner as well as the third respondent.

¶4According to the petitioner, the third respondent / husband is in the habit of consuming alcohol and abusing the petitioner.

¶5The third respondent would submit that the petitioner had eloped with a person. It is also stated that the petitioner herein had preferred a petition for divorce in H.M.O.P.No.16 of 2025 before the Additional Sub Court, Kallakurichi, and the same is pending.

¶6When both the parties have made contradictory statements abusing each other, this Court, in exercise of its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot venture into those disputed facts. In this background, we are of the view that the parties may be granted liberty to approach the Family Court concerned seeking for custodial / visitation rights.

¶7Accordingly, the present Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed with liberty to workout the remedy before the Family Court concerned with regard to custody of the children and visitation rights. Till an appropriate order is passed by the Family Court concerned, the children namely, Rakshan, aged about 6 years and Thalapathy, aged about 4 years, shall be with the third respondent / father. However, the petitioner / mother shall have the right to visit her children during every weekend namely, Saturday and Sunday. In case, any application for custody of the children and visitation rights is filed, the Family Court concerned shall adjudicate the same without being influenced by any of the observations made in this order. (M.S.RAMESH J.) (N.SENTHILKUMAR J.) 22-04-2025 ASI To

¶1The Superintendent of Police, Kallakurichi District.

¶2The Inspector of Police, Kallakurichi Police Station, Kallakurichi District.

¶3The Additional Sub Court, Kallakurichi.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

M.S.RAMESH, J. and

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J. ASI

23.04.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 23.04.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Subashini W/o. Dhinagaran ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, Kallakurichi District. 2. The State rep. By its The Inspector of Police, Kallakurichi Police Station, Kallakurichi District. 3. Dhinagaran ... Respondents PRAYER: This Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus directing the first and second respondents to produce the petitioner's children namely, Rakshan, aged about 6 years and Thalapathy, aged about 4 years before this Court from the custody of the third respondent and hand over their custody to the petitioner forthwith. For Petitioner : M/s. R. Raji For Respondent : Mr. R. Muniyapparaj Nos.1 and 2 Additional Public Prosecutor Assisted by Mr.M.Sylvester John For Respondent No.3 : Mr. M. Vijayaraghavan - - -

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.