VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

S.Jayabalan v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 March 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 8635/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose

Judgment

O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents not to measure the land morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition since an application in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in O.S.No.196 of 2019 pertaining to the very same property is pending on the file of the Sub Court, Panruti. Based on the 4th respondent's request, the respondents 2 and 3 are proceeding to survey the property morefully disclosed in the prayer to this Writ Petition.

2.Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3.

3.The grievance of the petitioner in this Writ Petition is that since the Civil Suit is pending in O.S.No.196 of 2019 on the file of the Sub Court, Panruti, pertaining to the very same property, the 2nd and 3rd respondents cannot survey the land.

4.Instead of raising objections before the respondents 2 and 3, the Page2 of 4 petitioner has directly filed this Writ Petition. Necessarily, the respondents 2 and 3 will have to consider the petitioner's objections as raised in this Writ Petition and only thereafter, proceed with the survey and demarcation of boundaries deducted based on the request of the 4th respondent. Since no adverse orders are passed in this Writ Petition against the 4th respondent, notice to the 4th respondent is dispensed with by this Court.

5.For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of, by directing the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the objections of the petitioner namely the pendency of the application in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in O.S.No.196 of 2019 on the file of the Sub Court, Panruti, pertaining to the very same property and only after considering the said objections, the respondents 2 and 3 shall proceed with the survey and demarcation of boundary of the property based on the request made by the 4th respondent.

6.With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 03-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GSA Page3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. GSA To

¶1The District Collector Collector Office, Cuddalore District.

¶2The Thashildhar Panruti Cuddalore District.

¶3The Head Survivor Thashildhar Office, Panruti, Cuddalore District. 03-03-2026 Page4 of 4

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.Jayabalan S/o. Sigamani, No.241/A, South Street, Maligampattu and Post, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District -607 106. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Collector Office, Cuddalore District. 2. The Thashildhar Panruti Cuddalore District. 3. The Head Survivor Thashildhar Office, Panruti, Cuddalore District. 4. C. Sukravel No.488, South Street, Maligampattu and Post, Panruti, Cuddalore. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, restraining the Respondents 2 and 3 not to measure the peaceful possession of the petitioner in respect of land falling in respect of Old Survey No.117/9 New Survey No.223/2 measuring an extent of 36 cents in Maligampattu Village, Maligampattu Revenue Village, Panruti, Cuddalore District by considering petitioner's representation dated 12.02.2026 Page1 of 4 and pendency disposal of the I.A.No. 1/2025 in O.S. 196/2019 on the file of the Sub Court at Panruti. For Petitioner(s): Mr. K.Vijayakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander, Special Government Pleader (for R1 to R3)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.