- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 March 2026
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- WP 10310/2026
Judgment
ORDER Mrs.P.Selvi, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondent.
¶2This Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the Respondent. Page2 of 4
¶3The Petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 24.02.2025. It is the case of the Petitioner that the Petitioner is not required to file annual Return in Form GSTR 9 under Section 47 of the proviso of Section 44 (1) r/w Rule 80 of the respective GST Rule.
¶4It is submitted that the Petitioner's turn over was only confined to Rs.27 lakhs and that the demand has been confirmed based on the Return filed. It is submitted that the Petitioner had also filed a reply on 22.02.2025 which has not been however considered while passing the impugned order.
¶5The Petitioner appears to have made out a case for interfering with the impugned order, although the Petitioner is before this court long after the impugned order was passed on 24.02.2025. Therefore, this case is remitted back to the respondent to pass a fresh order in view of the impugned order.
¶6Petitioner shall file a proper reply together with proper documents to substantiate that Petitioner's turn over was less than the threshold prescribed under Notification No.15/2025-CT issued under Section 44 (1) proviso to Section 44(1) of the respective GST Enactments.
¶7In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the Respondent shall proceed to pass a final order on merits and in accordance with Page3 of 4 law as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months of such reply.
¶8In case the Petitioner fails to comply with any of the stipulations, the Respondent is at liberty to proceed against the Petitioner to recover the tax in accordance with law as if this Writ Petition was dismissed in limine today.
¶9Needless to state, before passing any such order, the Respondent shall give due notice to the Petitioner.
¶10This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 17-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order GV To State Tax Officer JJ Nagar Assessment Circle, No.1, PAPJM Annexure Building, 2nd Floor,Greams Road, Chennai-06. WPoNo.o10310oofo2026 C.SARAVANANoJ. GV WPoNo.o10310oofo2026 AND WMPoNO.o11182oOFo2026 17-03-2026 Page4oofo4
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN AND WMP No. 11182 OF 2026 M/s.SONA COATINGS Rep by its Proprietor, Mrs. Lookes Leena Santhosh, 02, Nithiyam Kamal Spartan Nagar Mogpappair East,Chennai-037. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Tax Officer JJ Nagar Assessment Circle, No.1, PAPJM Annexure Building, 2nd Floor,Greams Road, Chennai-06. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records on the file of the respondent proceedings in GSTIN 33APIPL5572K1ZK/2020 - 21 dated 24.02.2025 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Johnson For Respondent(s): Mrs.P.Selvi, GA
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.