- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 March 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 10518/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents to correct the revenue records pertaining to the property more fully described in the prayer to this writ petition by restoring the petitioner's name as pattadar as per the Allotment No.215 dated 16.02.1963.
¶2The petitioner claims that she is the owner of the property more fully described in the prayer to the writ petition. However, according to the petitioner, her name has been erroneously omitted from the revenue records relating to the subject property. The petitioner further claims that she is in possession and enjoyment of the said property even as on date. In this regard, the petitioner had given representations to the respondents seeking inclusion of her name as Pattadar in respect of the said property. The last such representation was given by the petitioner on 19.01.2026. Since the Page3 of 5 representation of the petitioner has not been considered, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court.
¶3Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
¶5This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation dated 19.01.2026.
¶6For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 4th respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 19.01.2026, seeking restoration of her name as pattadar as per allotment No.215 dated 26.02.1963, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the necessary parties, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Page4 of 5
¶7With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 17-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RKA To
¶1Housing and urban Development Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
¶2Youth Welfare and Sports Development Department, Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.
¶3The Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
¶4The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore - 641 018.
¶5The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore South, Coimbatore District - 641 018.
¶6The Tahsildar, Madukkarai Taluk, Coimbatore District - 641 105. WPoNo.o10518oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSE,oJ. RKA WPoNo.o10518oofo2026 17-03-2026 Page5oofo5
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and WMP No.11388 of 2026 N.Dhanalakshmi W/o.Late Nakkiran, 25, V.K.Road, Peelamedu, Coimbatore District - 641 004. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Housing and urban Development Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 2. Youth Welfare and Sports Development Department, Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 3. The Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005. 4. The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore - 641 018. 5. The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore South, Coimbatore District - 641 018. 6. The Tahsildar, Madukkarai Taluk, Coimbatore District - 641 105. ..Respondent(s) Page2 of 5 Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to correct revenue records of S.No.536/2, Maluchampatty Village Madukkarai Taluk, Coimbatore District by restoring Petitioner's name as pattadar as per the allotment No.215 dated 26.02.1963. For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Vigneswaran For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander,SGP For Respondent
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.