VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

C.Deivam v. The District Revenue Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 March 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 9515/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a limited relief. The petitioner seeks for an early disposal of his appeal, dated 06.09.2025 pending on the file of the 1st respondent.

¶2Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse order is passed against the 4th respondent in this writ petition, notice to the 4th respondent is dispensed with by this Court.

¶3No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if a direction is issued to the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner's appeal, dated

06.09.2025 on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections, if any, from the 4th respondent and any third party, whom the 1st respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court, by adhering to the principles of natural justice. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's appeal. Page No.2 of 4

¶4For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioner's appeal, dated 06.09.2025 on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections, if any, from the 4th respondent and any third party, whom the 1st respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, by adhering to the principles of natural justice.

¶5With the aforesaid direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

17.03.2026 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri – 635 001.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri – 635 001.

3.The Tahsildar, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri – 635 001. Page No.3 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,

J.

sp W.P.No.

9515 o

f 2026

17.03.2026 Page No.4 of 4

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.03.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE C.Deivam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri – 635 001. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri – 635 001. 3.The Tahsildar, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri – 635 001. 4.Nataraj ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent herein to consider the petitioner appeal petition dated 06.09.2025, with regard to transfer of Patta No.368 from the name of 4th respondent to the name of the petitioner's father namely Chinnasamy S/o.Perumal Goundar in respect of landed property of an extent of 2 Acres and 27 cents in S.No.485/3 in Puliyampatti Village, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner herein, within a stipulated time frame by this Court. Page No.1 of 4 For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thamaraiselvan For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate [R1 to R3] Notice dispensed with [R4] *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.