- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 March 2026
- Bench
- P.T. Asha
- Case no.
- WP 8945/2026
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "to consider the petitioners representation dated 19.10.2025 and to direct the respondent to pay interest of 12 percent P.A. for delay of 600 days till the date of order in releasing the petitioners pension amount and to calculate correct D.A. and to give petitioner EL benefits difference amount."
¶2The case of the petitioner is that he had joined the services of the respondent Corporation as a Driver and after rendering 30 years of unblemished service, retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on
29.02.2024. The main grievance of the petitioner is that, though he had retired from service as early as 29.02.2024, his terminal benefits were settled belatedly only on 25.08.2025, contrary to the Pension Rules, and without payment of any interest. That apart, while disbursing his terminal benefits, the respondents had Page3 of 5 in correctly calculated the applicable percentage of Dearness Allowance Therefore, the petitioner had submitted a representation dated 19.10.2025 seeking interest for the belated settlement of the terminal benefits and also seeking reimbursement of the differential amount arising from the recalculation of the terminal benefits by applying the appropriate Dearness Allowance percentage. However, the said representation has not been considered to date. Hence, the present Writ Petition.
¶3Heard the learned counsel on either side.
¶4Considering the limited relief sought for by the petitioner and taking note of the fact that the petitioner's representation dated 19.10.2025 has not been considered to date, the Writ Petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated
19.10.2025, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 06-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SHR Page4 of 5 To
¶1The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Villupuram) Ltd., No.3/137, Salamedu, Kandamanadi P.O. Villupuram District -605602
¶2The General Manager Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Villupuram) Ltd., Cuddalore Region, No.2, Imperial Road, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District -607 002
¶3The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Villupuram) Ltd., Pension Fund Trust, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002 Page5 of 5 P.T.ASHA J. SHR 06-03-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA K.Viswanathan S/o. Kuppusamy, C/9, Bhaarath Nagar, Kondur, Cuddalore -607 006 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Villupuram) Ltd., No.3/137, Salamedu, Kandamanadi P.O. Villupuram District -605602 2. The General Manager Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Villupuram) Ltd., Cuddalore Region, No.2, Imperial Road, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District -607 002 3. The Administrator Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Villupuram) Ltd., Pension Fund Trust, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002 ..Respondent(s) Page2 of 5 Prayer: - Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus to consider the petitioners representation dated 19.10.2025 and to direct the respondent to pay interest of 12 percent P.A. for delay of 600 days till the date of order in releasing the petitioners pension amount and to calculate correct D.A. and to give petitioner EL benefits difference amount. For Petitioner(s): M/s.M.Mullaipoovizhi For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Vinothraj, Standing Counsel for R.1 and R.2
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.