- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 March 2026
- Bench
- Krishnan Ramasamy
- Case no.
- WP 8942/2022
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Krishnan Ramasamy
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 2nd respondent to forthwith consider and pass necessary orders on the complaint of the petitioner dated 3.12.2018 within a stipulated period.
¶2The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a senior citizen and he executed a Settlement Deed in favour of his sons who are the respondents 3 and 4 in this writ petition by settling his property measuring 2.64 Acres in Survey No.153/3 at Manivilundan Village, Salem District. Since the said respondents failed to maintain the petitioner, he made a complaint before the 2nd respondent under Section 23 read with Section 7 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 on
03.12.2018, to declare the Settlement Deed as null and void. But no action has been taken on the same till date. Hence this petition.
¶3The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit since the cancellation of the Settlement Deed sought for by the petitioner could not be done in terms of Section 23 read with Section 7 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, enquiry will be conducted and appropriate orders will be passed on the complaint made by the petitioner on 03.12.2018, within a period of eight weeks. Page3 of 5
¶4Heard both sides. Perused the records.
¶5Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, since the Settlement Deed could not be cancelled in terms of Section 23 read with Section 7 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, the 2nd respondent is directed to conduct enquiry on the complaint given by the petitioner on 03.12.2018 and forward the enquiry report to the Authority concerned for cancellation of Settlement Deed executed by the Petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶6This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs. 03-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order arr Page4 of 5 To
¶1The District Collector Salem District, Salem.
¶2The Revenue Divisional officer Attur, Salem District. WPoNo.o8942oofo2022 KRISHNANoRAMASAMY,oJ. arr WPoNo.o8942oofo2022 03-03-2026 Page5oofo5 Page6 of 5
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY M.Krishnan S/o. Marimuthu, Varma Garden, Chinna Killappatti, Kannankurichi Post, Salem 636 008, Salem District. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector Salem District, Salem. 2. The Revenue Divisional officer Attur, Salem District. 3. M.K.Napolean 4. M.K.Soccratees ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to forthwith consider and pass necessary orders on the complaint of the petitioner dated 3.12.2018 within a stipulated period. For Petitioner: Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondents: Mr.P.Ganesan (R1 and R2) Government Advocate Mr.L.Mouli (R3 and R4) Page2 of 5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.