VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Subramaniyam v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
13 March 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 9613/2026

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to forbear the respondents from using the land morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, which according to the petitioners is classified as "Kalam Poromboke" for any other purpose apart from agricultural purposes, based on the petitioners' representation, dated 19.02.2026.

¶2Ms.C.Meera Arumugam, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the 3rd respondent.

¶3The petitioners claim that the respondents are now attempting to use the land morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition for the purpose of constructing a sewage treatment plant, which according to the petitioners is in violation of the classification. The petitioners had Page No.2 of 7 given a representation on 19.02.2026 to the respondents to forebear them from using the land for a different purpose. Since the said representation was not considered, the petitioners have filed this writ petition.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioners' representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioners.

¶5This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioners' representation.

¶6For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the 3rd respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioners' representation dated 19.02.2026 seeking to forbear the respondents from using the land morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition for a different purpose than as per the classification, namely "Kalam Poromboke" i.e., the usage for agricultural purpose only, after giving due consideration to the supporting Page No.3 of 7 documents produced by the petitioners, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

13.03.2026 Index : Yes / No (2/2) Speaking order / Non-speaking order sp Page No.4 of 7 To

1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Namakkal, Namakkal District – 637 003.

2.The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Mohanur, Namakkal District – 637 015.

3.The Executive Officer, Mohanur Town Panchayat, Mohanur, Namakkal District – 637 015. Page No.5 of 7 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,

J.

sp

13.03.2026 (2/2) Page No.6 of 7 W.P.No.9613oofo2026 W.M.P.No.10364oofo2026 in W.P.No.9613oofo2026 oABDULoQUDDHOSEo,oJo. Ordered o on o payment o ofo separateocourtofee.

13.03.2026 sp (½) PageoNo.7oofo7

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.03.2026 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and W.M.P.No.10367 of 2026 1.Subramaniyam 2.Anbalagan ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The District Collector, District Collectorate, Namakkal, Namakkal District – 637 003. 2.The Tahsildar, Office of Tahsildar, Mohanur, Namakkal District – 637 015. 3.The Executive Officer, Mohanur Town Panchayat, Mohanur, Namakkal District – 637 015. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondents from using the land comprised in S.No.391/2, Mohanur Village, Mohanur Taluk, Namakkal District, classified as "Kalam Poramboke", for any other purpose apart from Agricultural purposes, by considering the petitioner's representation dated 19.02.2026. Page No.1 of 7 For Petitioners : Mr.S.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.C.Meera Arumugam Additional Government Pleader [R1 & R2] Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai Government Advocate [R3] *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.