- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 24 March 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 10002/2026
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 02.02.2026 wherein the petitioners requested that their agricultural patta lands in Survey Nos.433, 465 and 469 more fully disclosed in the prayer to the writ petition, should not be acquired.
¶2According to the petitioners, there is a proposal to acquire lands, which includes the petitioners agricultural lands, more fully disclosed in the prayer to the writ petition for the purpose of establishing a SIPCOT Industrial project. The petitioner seeks a direction to forbear the respondents from acquiring their agricultural patta lands situated in Survey Nos.433, 465 and
¶469The petitioner in this regard had submitted a representation to the 4th respondent on 02.02.2026 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court.
¶3Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan, learned Additional Government Pleader for respondents 1, 2 and 4 to 6 and Mrs.R.Revathi, learned Standing Counsel for Page4 of 6 3rd respondent.
¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation, as stated above, is directed to be considered, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
¶5This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.
¶6For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the 4th respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner's representation dated 02.02.2026, referred supra, requesting the respondents not to acquire the petitioner's agricultural patta lands situated in Survey Nos.433, 465 and 469 more fully, described in the prayer to the writ petition, after giving due consideration of the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 24-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RKA Page5 of 6 To
¶1The State of Tamilnadu rep by its Secretary Industries Investment promotion and Commerce Department St.George Fort, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009
¶2The Commissioner Land Administration Chepuak Chennai-600 005
¶3The Managing Director Sipcot No.19-A Rukmani Lakshmipathi Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008
¶4The District Collector Tirupathur
¶5The Special District Revenue officer Land Acquisition officer, Tirupathur
¶6The Tahsildar Natarampalli Taluk WPoNo.o10002oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSE,oJ. RKA WPoNo.o10002oofo2026 24-03-2026 Page6oofo6
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. P.Shivaraj W/o.Perumal, No.5/161, Koyankollai village Mallagunda, Natarampalli Taluk 2. Lakshmi W/o.Sivasasankaran Mallagunda, Natarampalli Taluk 3. Vasantha W/o.perumal Mallagunda, Natarampalli Taluk 4. Velayutham S/o.Sanjeevi Mallagunda, Natarampalli Taluk 5. Viswanathan S/o.Chinnasamy No.264, Velamarathuteshil Mallagunda Natarampalli Taluk ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamilnadu Page2 of 6 rep by its secretary, Industries Investment promotion and Commerce Department, St.George Fort, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009 2. The Commissioner Land Administration, Chepuak, Chennai-600 005 3. The managing Director Sipcot No.19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathi Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 4. The District Collector, Tirupathur District, Tirupathur. 5. The Special District Revenue officer Land Acquisition Officer, Tirupathur District, Tirupathur 6. The Tahsildar Natarampalli Taluk, ..Respondent(s) Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 2.2.2026 and thereby, direct the respondents not to acquire the petitioners agricultural patta land situated in Survey No. 433, 465 and 469, Mallagunda, Natarampalli Taluk, Tirupathur District for the purpose of Sipcot Industrial Park and pass orders. Page3 of 6 For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Sundarapandiyan For Respondent(s): Mr.M.R.Gokulkrishnan, Additional Government Pleader For R1 ,R2 R4 to R6 Mr.R.Revathi, Standing Counsel for R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.