VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Thasthageer, v. M.Prasath,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 July 2025
Bench
P.B. Balajiauthor
Case no.
CRP 3152/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P.B. Balaji

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.07.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI

¶1Thasthageer ...Sole Petitioner in CRP.No.3163 of 2025

¶2Mohammed Ibrahim, Minor rep. by his Natural guardian father ...Petitioners in CRP.Nos.3152 & 3164 of 2025 Vs.

¶1M.Prasath

¶2Ashwin

¶3M/s. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Rep. by its Manager,

Old No.29b, New No.238, 1st Floor, Jambubala Complex, Arcot Road,

Vellore – 632 004. ...Respondents in all CRP's. Common Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to direct the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Vellore to complete the trial in MCOP.Nos.228, 227 & 226 of 2024 respectively within a specific period of time prescribed by this Hon'ble Court. Page No.1 of 5 In all CRP's.: For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sunil Kumar.R COMMON ORDER For brevity, the petitioners are referred to as per their array in CRP.No.3152 of 2025.

¶2The petitioners claim compensation at the rate of Rs.40,00,000/-, Rs.20,00,000/- and Rs.40,00,000/- respectively before the Tribunal for the Motor accident where the petitioners lost their family members namely Shayin, who is the wife of the 1st petitioner and the mother of the 2nd petitioner and Mohammed Suban, who is the elder son of the 1st petitioner and the elder brother of the 2nd petitioner and also for the injuries suffered by the 1st petitioner.

¶3The petitioners now seek expeditious disposal of the MCOP proceedings pending before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Vellore in MCOP.Nos.226 to 228 of 2024. Page No.2 of 5

¶4Considering the nature of reliefs sought for in these revision petitions, notice to the respective respondents is dispensed with.

¶5I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and I have also perused the materials available on record.

¶6It is seen that the 3rd respondent/insurance company has entered appearance in the said MCOPs and the 1st respondent has been served with notice. However, the 2nd respondent is yet to be served with notice.

¶7Considering that the petitioners seek speedy disposal of the MCOP proceedings in MCOP.Nos.228, 227 & 226 of 2024 respectively, filed seeking compensation for the death of their family members and also for the injuries suffered by the 1st petitioner, I am inclined to issue a direction to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Vellore to ensure that the service and pleadings are completed within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter, the trial shall commence in the main MCOPs and the same shall be disposed Page No.3 of 5 of within a period ten (10) months thereafter.

¶8With the above observations and directions, these Civil Revision petitions stand disposed of. No costs.

24.07.2025 skt Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No To The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Vellore. Page No.4 of 5 CRP.Nos.3152,o3163o&o3164oofo2025 Poo.B.oBALAJI,ooJ. skt CRP.Nos.3152,o3163o&o3164oofo2025

24.07.2025 PageoNo.5oofo5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.