VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Sivagmi, v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 March 2026
Bench
Abdul Quddhoseauthor
Case no.
WP 9819/2026

Judgment

ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to survey, subdivide, and grant separate patta in the name of the petitioner for the properties morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner's online application dated 22.01.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶2The petitioner claims that by virtue of the sale deed dated 01.12.2025, registered as Document No. 3902 of 2025, she is the absolute owner of the properties morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner seeks subdivision of the same through her online application submitted with the respondents on 22.01.2026. Since the said application has not been considered by the respondents till date, the petitioner has filed this petition.

¶3Mr. S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 5 and Mr. V. Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) accepts notice on behalf of the sixth respondent. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 7 to 24, notice to the respondents 7 to 24 is dispensed with by this Court.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's application is considered on merits and in accordance with law after hearing the objections of all necessary parties, which includes the private respondents, namely Respondents 7 to 24.

¶5The Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's application seeking issuance of subdivision patta in her name.

¶6For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the fourth respondent to survey, subdivide, and grant separate patta in favour of the petitioner, based on the petitioner's sale deed dated 01.12.2025, registered as Document No. 3902 of 2025, after hearing the objections of all necessary parties, which includes Respondents 7 to 24. The fourth respondent shall complete the aforesaid exercise within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If the fourth respondent decides to reject the petitioner's request, the fourth respondent shall pass a speaking order with regard to the contention of the petitioner and the supporting documents produced by her. If required, the fourth respondent shall seek assistance of the sixth respondent police. No Costs. 24-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To

1.The District Collector Collectorate, Ranipet District, Ranipet

2.The District Revenue officer Collectorate, Ranipet Distrct, Ranipet

3.The Revenue Divisional officer Arakonam, Ranipet District

4.The Tahsildhar Shlinghur Taluk, Ranipet District

5.The Village Administrative officer Karikal village account,Sholinghur Taluk, Ranipet District

6.The Inspector of police Kondapalayam police Station, Sholinghur Taluk, Ranipet Distrct ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab

24-03-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. Sivagmi, W/o Sankar, Old Door. no 5 New Door No 3A Appadurai pillai Street, Karai Village, Walaja Taluk,Ranipet District Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Collectorate, Ranipet District, Ranipet 2.The District Revenue officer Collectorate, Ranipet Distrct, Ranipet 3.The Revenue Divisional officer Arakonam, Ranipet District 4.The Tahsildhar Shlinghur Taluk, Ranipet District 5.The Village Administrative officer Karikal village account,Sholinghur Taluk, Ranipet District 6.The Inspector of police Kondapalayam police Station, Sholinghur Taluk, Ranipet Distrct 7.Ramasami, S/o Venkatasamy naidu, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 8.Pushpa, W/o Ranganathan,, Bajajani kovil Street, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 9.Kadikasalam, S/o Ranganathan, Bajajani kovil Street, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 10.Narasimman S/o Ranganathan, Bajajani kovil Street, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 11.Markandan, S/o Ranganathan, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 12.Usha Rani, W/o venkatesan, Bajajani kovil Street, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 13.Elumalai S/o Narasimmal Pillai, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 14.Paripooranammal W/o Gopal Pillai, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 15.Ranganathan S/o venkatasami Naidu, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 16.Pazhani, S/o Baktha Naidu , Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 17.Santha, W/o Krishnayaa, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 18.Rajavelu S/o Krishnayya, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 19.Govinda Naidu S/o Andiyappa Naidu, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 20.Prasath S/o maunirathinam, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 21.Prtab S/o Munirathinam Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 22.Navaneetha D/o Pazani Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 23.Vimala D/o Pazhani, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District 24.Prakash, D/o Pazhani, Karikal Village, Sholinghur Taluk,' Ranipet District Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondents to survey, Sub divide and to grant separate patta in petitioner name to the properties covered under petitioner sale deed dated 01.12.2025 vide document No. 3902 of 2025,. registered on the file of Sub Registrar of Sholinghur For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Gouthaman For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt.Advocate For R1 to R5 Mr.V.Meganathan Govt.Advocate For R6 ND/W - R7 to R24 -Pvt

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.