VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Baktha Ramanujum v. The Commissioner

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 March 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 9031/2023

Judgment

Order This Writ Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 11.11.2022 in M.A.No.800/2021 and direct the respondents to appoint the petitioners as the hereditary trustee of the temple in question.

¶2The case of the petitioner is that they are the hereditary trustees of Arulmigu Karvaradharajaperumal Kovil Temple at Kamanaicken Palayam. While such being the position, the impugned order dated 12.10.2022 came to be passed by the 2nd respondent, wherein the petitioners were sought for the patta of 32 acres of land, which is in the name of their father, to be transferred in the name of the temple, so as to allow the land to be leased vide public auction within a period of 6 months. The said impugned order was also followed by two registered letters dated 11.11.2022 and 22.12.2022, calling upon the petitioners to convert the patta in favour of the temple. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners are before this Court. Page3 of 4

¶3When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents submitted that in M.P.No.800 of 2021, the final order has been passed on 13.05.2024. Hence, the petitioners may work out their remedy in the manner known to law, as there is nothing to decide in this writ petition.

¶4In view of the above submission made by the counsel for the respondent, since final order was passed in M.P.No.800 of 2021, there is nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition. Therefore, this Writ Petition is closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to work out their remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 03-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order SK To

¶1The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, 119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34.

¶2Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Tirupur.

¶3Inspector Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Palladam. WPoNo.o9031oofo2023 M.DHANDAPANIoJ. sk WPoNo.o9031oofo2023 AND WMPoNO.o9156oOFo2023,WMPoNO.o9157oOFo2023 03-03-2026 Page4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI AND WMP NO. 9156 OF 2023,WMP NO. 9157 OF 2023 1. Baktha Ramanujum 2. Venkatachalam 3. Kausalya 4. Minor Sri Hari S/o.Denadayalan, Rep. by his Mothor and Natural Guardian, Mrs.Kausalya, ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, 119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34. 2. Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Tirupur. 3. Inspector Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Palladam. ..Respondent(s) to call for the records in Miscellaneous Application No. 800 of 2021 dated 12.10.2022 on the file of the 2nd respondent and the consequent letters dated 11.11.2022 and 22.12.2022 forwarded by the 3rd respondent in Page2 of 4 furtherance of the impugned order and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and manifestly erroneous and further direct the respondents to appoint the petitioners 1-4 as the hereditary trustee of the Arulmigu Karivaradharajaperumal Kovil For Petitioner(s): Ms.V.Srimathi For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Ravichandran, Additional Government Pleader (HR & CE)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.