- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 March 2026
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- WP 9964/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan
Judgment
ORDER Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the Respondents.
¶2This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the Respondents.
3.The petitioner is before this court against the impugned order dated
22.12.2025 passed by the 1st respondent/Appellate Authority whereby the petitioner appeal against the order dated 20.06.2025 has been rejected on the ground of limitation. The said appeal has been rightly rejected by the Appellate Authority as it is beyond the condonable period of limitation provided under Section 107 of the respective GST Enactments, as such, dismissal of the appeal by the 1st respondent cannot be found fault with. It is also noticed that the petitioner had filed the appeal against the order dated 20.06.2025 on 21.08.2025 which came to be rejected by an order dated 25.10.2025 on the ground that Non-receipt of certified copies, Statement of Facts, Ground of Appeal not attached with annexure of FORM GST APL-01. However, it appears that the petitioner has deposited 10% of the disputed tax as is reflected from Form
GST-02 dated 25.10.2025 while rejecting the appeal filed on 21.08.2025.
¶4At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is willing to pre-deposit 15% of the disputed tax over and above the 10% deposited while filing the Appeal as a condition for seeking liberty to agitate his claims before the 1st Respondent/Appellate Authority.
¶5The learned counsel for the Petitioner has also made an following endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle which has been extracted hereunder:- "Petitioner undertakes to deposit 15% of the disputed tax amount."
¶6Recording the same, the case is remitted back on the file of the 1st Respondent to pass a fresh order on merits subject to the Petitioner depositing 15% of the disputed tax over and above the 10% deposited while filing the Appeal, in cash or from the Petitioner's Electronic Cash Register within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
¶7In case the Petitioner complies with the above stipulations, the 1st Respondent shall consider the appeal and dispose the same, on merits and in accordance with law, on it's own turn, without further reference to limitation.
¶8This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations. No costs. Connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 17-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes kp To
1.The Deputy Commissioner (ST) O/o The Deputy Commissioner (St)
(GST) Appeal Indira Nagar, Avinashi Road , Tiruppur
2.The Commercial Tax Officer (st) Udumalpet South Assessment Circle, Tiruppur.
C. SARAVANAN. , J kp W.P.No.9964 of 2026
17.03.2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP Nos.10785 & 10788 of 2026 M/s Shri Vari Textiles Rep by its Managing partner, Mr. R. Gopalakrishnan SF. no 880/1 Kannamanaickanur Po Udumalpet, Tiruppur 642 154 Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Deputy Commissioner (ST) O/o The Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST) Appeal Indira Nagar, Avinashi Road , Tiruppur 2.The Commercial Tax Officer (st) Udumalpet South Assessment Circle, Tiruppur Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records connected with the impugned order passed by the 1st Respondent vide Form GST APL - 021 in ARN 331125001654M dated 22.12.2025 GSIN 33AEHFS6219J1ZU and quash the same and direct the 1st respondent to take the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order in Ref No ZD 33625211268J dated 20.06.2025 passed by the 2nd respondent on record and dispose the same on merits. For Petitioner(s): A Arun M. Muthu Yazhini S.R Gerthanaa Sri For Respondent(s): Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.