- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 14 July 2025
- Bench
- R.Sakthivel
- Case no.
- CMP 10152/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow R.Sakthivel
Judgment
in IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL in ---- Annammal W/o.Late.Nataraja Gounder Chinnaraj Gounder Kalam Ganapathipalayam Pollachi Taluk Coimbatore District. ...Petitioner [in all three CMPs] Versus Mylathal (Died) Pakkiyammal (Died)
¶1Bhavagvathiammal W/o.Late.Ramasamy Gounder
¶2Sarojini W/o.Late.Velusamy Gounder [Respondents 1&2 are residing at Govindapuram Behind Kerala State Check Post Muthulaimadal Panchayat Chittur Taluk, Pallakad District Kerala State. in
¶3Nalla Gounder S/o. Nachimuthu
¶4Senthil Kumar S/o. Ramasamy
¶5Jayaprakash S/o.Ramasamy [Respondents 3 to 5 are residing at Muthumpalayam Senguttupalayam-642 120 Negamam Via Kinathukadavu Taluk Coimbatore District].
¶6Vani Shree
¶7Anantha Jothi
¶8Devaki ...Respondents [in all three CMPs] Prayers: CMP.No.10152 of 2025: filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, praying to condone the delay of 125 days in filing this petition to set aside the abatement due to the death of the 2nd respondent, namely, Pakkiyammal in A.S.No. 359 of 2014. CMP.No. 10161 of 2025: filed under Order XXII Rule 9 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 2nd respondent, namely, Pakkiyammal in A.S.No. 359 of 2014. in CMP.No. 10164 of 2025: filed under Order XXII Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to bring on record the Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 herein as the legal heirs/legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent, namely, Pakkiyammal in A.S.No. 359 of 2014. In all three CMPs: For Petitioners : Ms.Mekala For Mr.N.Manoharan For RR3 & 4 : Mr.KB.Shrinivaas For Mr.T.P.Manokaran For RR6 to 8 : Mr.R.Kannan -- COMMON ORDER
(i) Civil Miscellaneous Petition No.10152 of 2025 has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 125 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the second respondent, viz., Pakkiyammal, in A.S. 359 of 2014.
(ii) Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 10161 of 2025 has been filed seeking to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the second respondent, viz., Pakkiyammal, in A.S. 359 of 2014. in
(iii) Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 10164 of 2025 has been filed seeking to bring on record the Respondent Nos.6 to 8 herein, as the legal heirs/legal representatives of the deceased second respondent, namely, Pakkiyammal, in A.S. 359 of 2014.
2.Ms.Mekala, representing Mr.N.Manoharan, learned Counsel on record for the petitioner, Mr.KB.Shrinivaas, representing Mr.T.P.Manokaran, learned Counsel on record for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 and Mr.R.Kannan, learned Counsel on record for the Respondent Nos.6 to 8 are before this Court.
¶3Heard both sides.
¶4This Court has perused the affidavit filed in support of these petitions and satisfied with the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, these petitions are allowed.
¶5In the result, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed.
14.07.2025 MSM Note: Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments in the above appeal and list the Appeal Suit on
04.08.2025 for final hearing. C.M.P.Nos.o10152,o10161o&o10164oofo2025 in A.S.No.359oofo2014 R.oSAKTHIVEL,oJ.,o MSM C.M.P.Nos.o10152,o10161o&o10164oofo2025 in A.S.No.359oofo2014
14.07.2025 oooo oooo
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.