- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 26 March 2026
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- WP 10224/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow Abdul Quddhose
Judgment
ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to rectify the mistake in the FMB Sketch and "A" Register for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition based on the petitioner's representation dated 20.01.2026 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
¶2According to the petitioner, the present FMB Sketch and "A" Register for the property is not in accordance with the sale deed standing in the name of the petitioner. In such circumstances, the petitioner seeks for rectification of the FMB Sketch and "A" Register. The petitioner had given a representation on
20.01.2026 to the respondents for rectification of the FMB Sketch and "A" Register. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed.
¶3Mr. S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
¶5This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's representation.
¶6For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the second respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 20.01.2026, seeking for rectification of the FMB Sketch and "A" Register for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after giving due consideration to the supporting documents filed by the petitioner.
¶7Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 26-03-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes ab To
1.The District collectorate Office of Collectorate Salem District
2.The District Revenue officer Office of the DRO, Salem District
3.The Revenue Divisional officer Office of Revenue Divisional officer Attur Town and Taluk Salem District
4.The Tahsildar Office of the Tahsildar Thalaivasal post and Taluk Salem District ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab
26-03-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1. A.Kullammal W/o.Arumugam No.4/152,Kaatukottai south Thenkumarai post Thalaivasal Taluk Salem District Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collectorate Office of Collectorate Salem District 2.The District Revenue officer Office of the DRO, Salem District 3.The Revenue Divisional officer Office of Revenue Divisional officer Attur Town and Taluk Salem District 4.The Tahsildar Office of the Tahsildar Thalaivasal post and Taluk Salem District Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 3rd and 4th respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 20.1.2026 and direct the respondent authorities to rectify the mistake in the FMB and A Register within a time to be stipulated by this court For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Rajakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt.Advocate For Respondent
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.