M.Rajakumar v. The Sub Collector

ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the Page3 of 6 respondents 1 and 2 to delete the names of the private respondents viz., the respondents 4 to 10 in the joint patta for the more fully disclosed in the prayer to the writ petition.

¶2The petitioner claims that erroneously the names of the private respondents 4 to 10 have been included in the joint patta for the property more fully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition. According to the petitioner, he is the absolute owner of the said property and therefore, the names of the private respondents viz., respondents 4 to 10 ought to be removed from the patta. The petitioner had submitted a representation on 09.05.2024 to the respondents 1 and 2, requesting them to delete the names of the private respondents 4 to 10 from the patta. Since the said representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

¶3Mr.S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3. Since no adverse orders are passed against the respondents 4 to 10, notice to them is dispensed with.

¶4No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner's representation, as stated above, is directed to be disposed of by the respondents, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of respondents 4 to 10 and all other necessary parties, whom the 2nd respondent Page4 of 6 deems fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶5This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's application dated 09.05.2024.

¶6For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law, on the petitioner's representation dated 09.05.2024, seeking for deletion of the names of the respondents 4 to 10 from the patta, as more fully disclosed in the prayer to the writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner and after hearing the objections of respondents 4 to 10 and any other third party, whom the 2nd respondent deems fit to enquire, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 02-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order RKA Page5 of 6 To

¶1The Sub Collector office of Sub Collector Mettur Dam, Mettur, Salem District.

¶2The Revenue Divisional officer office of Revenue Divisional officer, Mettur, Salem District.

¶3The Tasildhar, Taluk office Mettur, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. WPoNo.o11538oofo2026 ABDULoQUDDHOSE,oJ. RKA WPoNo.o11538oofo2026 02-04-2026 Page6oofo6

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE and WMP No.12581 of 2026 M.Rajakumar S/o.Muthuraj, Kakayan Street, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District-636 458 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Sub Collector Office of Sub Collector Mettur Dam, Mettur, Salem District. 2. The Revenue Divisional officer Office of Revenue Divisional officer, Mettur, Salem District. 3. The Tasildhar, Taluk office mettur, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 4. Kandan S/o.Kandasamy, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 5. Thoongan s/o.Kandasamy, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 6. Pachiammal w/o.Vellappan, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. Page2 of 6 7. Govindhan S/o.Vellappan, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 8. Murugesan s/o.Palanimuthu, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 9. Madhu S/o.Vellappan, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 10.Pappa D/o.Karupanan, Pallippatti Village, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. ..Respondent(s) Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to dispose off the petitioner's representation dated 09.05.2025 within time bound by considering the recommendations of the revenue officials and issue fresh patta to the petitioner and pass orders. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Chandrasekaran V.Bhuvaneshwari N.Manikanda Jayakumar E.Dhamodaran M.Vignesh For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Government Advocate for 1 to 3